A phase 1/2 randomized, double-blinded, placebo controlled ascending dose trial to assess the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of ARCT-021 in healthy adults

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

Background

The pandemic of coronavirus disease-19 (Covid-19) continues to afflict the lives and livelihoods of many as global demand for vaccine supply remains unmet.

Methods

Phase 1 of this trial (N=42) assessed the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of ascending levels of one-dose ARCT-021, a self-amplifying mRNA vaccine against Covid-19. Phase 2 (N=64) tested two-doses of ARCT-021 given 28 days apart. Both young and older adults were enrolled. The primary safety outcomes were local and systemic solicited adverse events (AEs) reported immediately and up to 7 days post-inoculation and unsolicited events reported up to 56 days after inoculation. Secondary and exploratory outcomes were antibody and T cell responses to vaccination, respectively.

Results

ARCT-021 was well tolerated up to one 7.5 μg dose and two 5.0 μg doses. Local solicited AEs, namely injection-site pain and tenderness, as well as systemic solicited AEs, such as fatigue, headache and myalgia, were more common in ARCT-021 than placebo recipients, and in younger than older adults. Seroconversion rate for anti-S IgG was 100% in all cohorts except for the 1 μg one-dose in younger adults and the 7.5 μg one-dose in older adults, which were each 80%. Neutralizing antibody titers increased with increasing dose although the responses following 5.0 μg and 7.5 μg ARCT-021 were similar. Anti-S IgG titers overlapped with those in Covid-19 convalescent plasma. ARCT-021 also elicited T-cell responses against the S glycoprotein.

Conclusion

Taken collectively, the favorable safety and immunogenicity profiles support further clinical development of ARCT-021.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.07.01.21259831: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    EthicsIRB: The trial was conducted at the Singapore Health Services (SingHealth) Investigational Medicine Unit, following approvals by the SingHealth Centralized Institutional Review Board (CIRB F/2020/2553) and the Singapore Health Sciences Authority.
    Consent: Written informed consent was provided by all the participants before enrollment.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    RandomizationTrial design, participants and oversight: ARCT-021-01 is a randomized, double-blinded, placebo (0.9% saline) controlled study to assess the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of different dose levels of ARCT-021.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power AnalysisStatistical Analysis: No formal sample size calculation was performed.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.


    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: We found the following clinical trial numbers in your paper:

    IdentifierStatusTitle
    NCT04480957RecruitingAscending Dose Study of Investigational SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine A…
    NCT04668339Active, not recruitingA Trial Evaluating the Safety and Effects of an RNA Vaccine …


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.