Simulating the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions limiting transmission in COVID-19 epidemics using a membrane computing model

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

Epidemics caused by microbial organisms are part of the natural phenomena of increasing biological complexity. The heterogeneity and constant variability of hosts, in terms of age, immunological status, family structure, lifestyle, work activities, social and leisure habits, daily division of time, and other demographic characteristics make it extremely difficult to predict the evolution of epidemics. Such prediction is, however, critical for implementing intervention measures in due time and with appropriate intensity. General conclusions should be precluded, given that local parameters dominate the flow of local epidemics. Membrane computing models allows us to reproduce the objects (viruses, hosts) and their interactions (stochastic but also with defined probabilities) with an unprecedented level of detail. Our LOIMOS model helps reproduce the demographics and social aspects of a hypothetical town of 10,320 inhabitants in an average European country where COVID-19 is imported from the outside. The above-mentioned characteristics of hosts and their lifestyle are minutely considered. The dynamics of the epidemics are reproduced and include the effects on viral transmission of innate and acquired immunity at various ages. The model predicts the consequences of delaying the adoption of non-pharmaceutical interventions (between 15 and 45 days after the first reported cases) and the effect of those interventions on infection and mortality rates (reducing transmission by 20%, 50%, and 80%) in immunological response groups. The lockdown for the elderly population as a single intervention appears to be effective. This modelling exercise exemplifies the application of membrane computing for designing appropriate interventions in epidemic situations.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.07.01.21259828: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    NIH rigor criteria are not applicable to paper type.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.


    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    A number of countries, such as Sweden, adopted a de-facto herd immunity approach, without imposing severe limitations to viral propagation in the community, with controversial results (Bjorklund and Ewing, 2020; Claeson and Hanson, 2020). The goal of the Swedish Public Health Agency was to assure the intensive care for elderly patients with the highest mortality risk (Chew et al., 2021). This approach could probably have been accompanied by a strict lockdown for the elderly. Considering the European incidence of COVID-19 deaths in May 2021, Sweden had a lower per capita incidence of COVID-19 mortality than France, Spain, United Kingdom, Italy, Belgium, or Hungary (Steward, 2021), and elderly lockdown is probably one of the most effective interventions to be considered (Soltesz et al., 2020). We should accept that the multifactorial and variable landscape of viral epidemics, where the infection process itself modifies the transmission parameters, is also influenced by the geography, demography, and lifestyles of the population, which makes it difficult to establish general fixed parameters, to a certain extent leading to a “parametric scepticism”. Therefore, the use of flexible models, such as those applied in this study, can mimic differing conditions (that can be adjusted to the locally observed conditions). Integrating parametric ranges and stochastic dynamics is simply a necessity in predicting the policy of corrective interventions in a particular local landscape.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.