A new model of unreported COVID-19 cases outperforms three known epidemic-growth models in describing data from Cuba and Spain

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

Estimating the unreported cases of Covid-19 in a region/country is a complicated problem. We propose a new mathematical model that, combined with a deterministic model of the total growth of cases, describes the time evolution of the unreported cases for each reported Covid-19 case. The new model considers the growth of unreported cases in plateau periods and the decrease towards the end of an epidemic wave. We combined the new model with a Gompertz-growth model, a generalized logistic model, and a susceptible-infectious-removed (SIR) model; and fitted them via Bayesian methods to data from Cuba and Spain. The combined-model fits yielded better Bayesian-Information-Criterion values than the Gompertz, logistic, and SIR models alone. This suggests the new model can achieve improved descriptions of the evolution of a Covid-19 epidemic wave. The new model is also able to provide reliable predictions of the epidemic evolution in a short period of time. We include in the paper the steps that researchers should take to use the new model for predictions with other data.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.06.29.21259707: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    NIH rigor criteria are not applicable to paper type.

    Table 2: Resources

    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    In the Bayesian inference carried out, the samples of the posterior distributions of the parameters were obtained using the Delayed-Rejection-Adaptive-Metropolis (DRAM) algorithm, implemented via the Python Package pymcmcstat [32], with 5 × 105 samples and burn-in number of 2.5 × 105.
    Python
    suggested: (IPython, RRID:SCR_001658)

    Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your code and data.


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    The forecast limitations are directly related to the limitations of the chosen deterministic model. In our case, the deterministic models Gompertz and GRM allow predicting the end of a wave, but they do not predict peaks of active infections or epidemic rebounds. Nevertheless, the Gompertz+U model shows good results in making short-term predictions. In some trajectories drawn from posterior distributions of the new-model parameters, a growth of reported cases was observed towards the final days when the deterministic model already showed a plateau shape. This was not a reason to discard these regions in the analysis because we consider this phenomenon to be plausible, because sometimes samples are accumulated without being tested by real-time polymerase chain reaction, due to laboratory availability or priority of the authorities of one region over another. Some current limitations of the new model are: The influence of the third limitation is reduced in this work by imposing limits on initial conditions of the model. Despite the above, we consider that the new model is a powerful tool to complement the information that decision-makers need to establish the appropriate policies to contain Covid-19.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.