Stable IgG-antibody levels in patients with mild SARS-CoV-2 infection
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
More knowledge regarding persistence of antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 infections in the general population with mild symptoms is needed. We measured and compared levels of SARS-CoV-2 spike- and nucleocapsid-specific IgG-antibodies in serum samples from 145 laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases and 324 non-cases. The IgG-antibody levels against the spike protein in cases were stable over the time-period studied (14 to 256 days), while antibody levels against the nucleocapsid protein decreased over time.
Article activity feed
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.06.16.21258960: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics Consent: Written consent was obtained from all study-participants.
Field Sample Permit: Serum sampling: Venous blood (5-40 mL) was collected into Serum Sampling Tubes (SST BD Vacutainer) on county level and transported at ambient temperature to regional laboratories for centrifugation and isolation of serum.
IRB: Ethical approval and financing: Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Swedish Ethical Review Board: Dnr 2020-03584.Sex as a biological variable not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding Testing was performed blinded, i.e. without disclosing any case information of the samples. Power Analysis not detected. Table 2: Resources
Antibodies Sentences Resources The purpose of … SciScore for 10.1101/2021.06.16.21258960: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics Consent: Written consent was obtained from all study-participants.
Field Sample Permit: Serum sampling: Venous blood (5-40 mL) was collected into Serum Sampling Tubes (SST BD Vacutainer) on county level and transported at ambient temperature to regional laboratories for centrifugation and isolation of serum.
IRB: Ethical approval and financing: Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Swedish Ethical Review Board: Dnr 2020-03584.Sex as a biological variable not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding Testing was performed blinded, i.e. without disclosing any case information of the samples. Power Analysis not detected. Table 2: Resources
Antibodies Sentences Resources The purpose of the questionnaire was to pre-screen for candidates likely to donate either antibody-positive or negative serum samples, as well as to allow for weighing of samples regarding gender, age, county of residence (county 1-3) and symptoms of respiratory tract infection (RTI) other than COVID-19. antibody-positivesuggested: NoneResults from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.
-