Baseline Characteristics and Outcomes of 180 Egyptian COVID-19 Patients ‎Admitted to Quarantine Hospitals of Ain Shams University: A Retrospective ‎Comparative Study‎

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.06.11.21258743: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    EthicsIRB: Before the start, The Ain Shams University Faculty of Medicine Research Ethics Committee (REC) gave its permission for the study to be carried out.
    Consent: Informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of this study.
    Sex as a biological variablePregnant women, patients with missing data and those who had hematological diseases or immunological disorders were excluded from the study.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Statistical methods: The results were generated using the Statistical Package of Social Science (SPSS) (version 26).
    SPSS
    suggested: (SPSS, RRID:SCR_002865)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    This study has some limitations that should be considered. First, it is a retrospective study that was performed in a limited hospital setting and included a relatively small sample size with disproportion in the different study groups. A large multi-center prospective observational study would be better to authenticate our findings. Another limitation is that all data included in this study were from the official records of the hospital; meanwhile, some patients have not been hospitalized for treatment because of the lack of awareness of disease severity, as well as the shortage of heath care facilities. A larger study that includes out-patients isolated at home in addition to hospitalized in-patients, would offer a more representative study population.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.