COVID-19 County Level Severity Classification with Imbalanced Dataset: A NearMiss Under-sampling Approach
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
COVID-19 pandemic that broke out in the late 2019 has spread across the globe. The disease has infected millions of people. Thousands of lives have been lost. The momentum of the disease has been slowed by the introduction of vaccine; however, some countries are still recording high number of casualties. The focus of this work is to design, develop and evaluate a machine learning county level COVID-19 severity classifier. The proposed model will predict severity of the pandemic in a county into low, moderate, or high. Policy makers will find the work useful in the distribution of vaccines. Four learning algorithms (two ensembles and two non-ensembles) were trained and evaluated. Class imbalance was addressed using NearMiss under-sampling of the majority classes. The result of our experiment shows that the ensemble models outperformed the non-ensemble models by a considerable margin.
Article activity feed
-
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.05.21.21257603: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter:…
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.05.21.21257603: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.
-
-