Microsimulation of SARS-CoV-2 Transmission in Society

  1. Anthony Roland Green
  2. Daniel Keep
  3. Ian Piper

Reviewed by

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

Log in to save this article

Abstract

The outbreak of the pandemic disease, COVID-19, has shown that the approaches by different countries has resulted in a range of infection rates through their societies. This has arisen from the varying personal behaviour and tactical use of lockdown strategies within each country. We report the use of microsimulation of a simulated community in Australia, using a discrete infection model within a community of residences, places of work and recreation to demonstrate the applicability of this method to both the current pandemic and to infection more generally. Simulations without any societal intervention on infection spread provided base simulations that could be compared with social and societal controls in the future and which were compared with the initial doubling times of country outbreaks across the world. Different population sizes were represented in some simulations and in other simulations the effects of either social distancing or the use of facial masks as personal behaviours was investigated within the community. Good agreement is found between the initial doubling times for several countries and the simulations that suggests that modelling infection as a collection of individual infections provides an alternative to current epidemiological models. The variation of the basic reproductive number, R 0 , with time and population size, suggests that one of the fundamentals assumptions in SIR type models is wrong, but varies according to the properties of the population being modelled. Investigation of the infection spread shows that the number of super-spreaders varies with the size of the population and occurs through contacts in clubs, supermarkets, schools and theatres where the source of infection is an employee and where there are high numbers of contacts. The simulations of individual control show that the benefits of social distancing or wearing masks is only fully realised where there is considerable compliance within society to these measures.

Article activity feed

  1. ScreenIT

    SciScore for 10.1101/2021.05.16.21257298: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Ethicsnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).

    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.

    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.

    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.

    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.

  2. Version published to 10.1101/2021.05.16.21257298v1 on medRxiv