Obstructive sleep apnea is highly prevalent in COVID19 related moderate to severe ARDS survivors: findings of level I polysomnography in a tertiary care hospital

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.05.04.21256593: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Ethicsnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.


    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    Important limitations of this study were:1) Presence of OSA could not be determined in patients who died during hospitalisation. This may have resulted in underestimation of prevalence of moderate to severe OSA. Although our previous work have shown increased mortality among those with high risk for OSA (as assessed with OSA screening questionnaires).23 2 ) Association between presence of OSA and severity of COVID19 could not be explored owing to inclusion of participants from only ICU. For this, patients with minimal or mild symptoms of COVID19 should have been included in study. However due to resource constraints, we restricted our study to ICU survivors. Participants of this study were patients from ICU only therefore findings should not be generalised to all COVID19 patients. To summarise, moderate-severe OSA is highly prevalent (73%) in COVID19 moderate to severe ARDS survivors and it will be interesting to explore further effect of role of OSA in pathophysiology of COVID19 ARDS.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.