Inhibiting LSD1 suppresses coronavirus-induced inflammation but spares innate antiviral activity

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Abstract

Tissue-resident macrophages exert critical but conflicting effects on the progression of coronavirus infections by secreting both anti-viral type I Interferons and tissue-damaging inflammatory cytokines. Steroids, the only class of host-targeting drugs approved for Covid19, indiscriminately suppress both responses, possibly impairing viral clearance, and provide limited clinical benefit. Here we set up a mouse in vitro co-culture system that reproduces the macrophage response to SARS-CoV2 seen in patients and allows quantitation of inflammatory and antiviral activities. We show that the NFKB-dependent inflammatory response can be selectively inhibited by ablating the lysine-demethylase LSD1, which additionally unleashed interferon-independent ISG activation and blocked viral egress through the lysosomal pathway. These results provide a rationale for repurposing LSD1 inhibitors, a class of drugs extensively studied in oncology, for Covid-19 treatment.

One-Sentence Summary

Targeting a chromatin-modifying enzyme in coronavirus infections curbs tissue-damage without affecting antiviral response

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.05.02.441948: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    EthicsConsent: Blood donors provided written informed consent for the collection of samples and subsequent analysis.
    Sex as a biological variableBMDM were obtained from bone marrow of 6-10 week old female C57Bl6 mice (Charles River).
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Cell Line AuthenticationContamination: To assure mycoplasma-free conditions, all cells were routinely tested.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    CD14 cells were purified by anti-CD14 monoclonal antibody (mAb)-conjugated magnetic microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec) and then cultured for 6 days in RPMI 1640 medium (Life Technologies Invitrogen), supplemented with heat-inactivated 10% lipopolysaccharide-free FBS, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 0.1 mM nonessential amino acids, 2 mM L-glutamine, 25 mM HEPES, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin (all from EuroClone) in the presence of human recombinant M-CSF (100 ng/µL; Peprotech).
    anti-CD14
    suggested: None
    Slides were stained with primary antibodies diluted in 1% BSA in PBS (NF-kB and IRF1 1:400, NSP9 1:1000) for 90 min.
    IRF1
    suggested: None
    NSP9
    suggested: None
    Cells labelled with DAPI and anti-NF-kB/NSP9 or anti-IRF1/NSP9 antibodies were imaged with a 60x 1.4 NA oil immersion objective lens on a CSU-W1 Yokogawa Spinning Disk confocal system with a 50 μm pinhole disk mounted on an Eclipse Ti2 stative and equipped with a motorized xyz stage, 6 solid state lasers, a multi-dichroic mirror, single emission filters and a Prime BSI sCMOS camera (TELEDYNE PHOTOMETRICS, Tucson, AZ 85706, USA).
    anti-NF-kB/NSP9
    suggested: None
    anti-IRF1/NSP9
    suggested: None
    The immunoprecipitation was performed using magnetic Dynabeads Protein G. Beads were blocked with 0,5% BSA in PBS and then mixed with the different antibodies (15 µg antibody:100 µl beads ratio) and incubated overnight on a rotating platform at 4°C. 1% of Triton X-100 was added to the sonicated lysates and lysates were centrifuged in microfuge (8000g, 10 min. at 4C) to pellet debris.
    antibody:100
    suggested: None
    Experimental Models: Cell Lines
    SentencesResources
    Briefly, supernatants from infected cells were 10-fold serially diluted and titrated on target cells plated at 80-90% confluence (for MHV, L929 cells; for SARS-CoV2, VeroE6 cells) in 96 wells in a total volume of 100 µl, (8 replicate wells for MHV, 10 replicate wells for SARS-CoV2) and incubated at 37 °C under 5% carbon dioxide.
    VeroE6
    suggested: JCRB Cat# JCRB1819, RRID:CVCL_YQ49)
    The plasmid was used to produce lentiviral particles in 293T cells.
    293T
    suggested: CCLV Cat# CCLV-RIE 1018, RRID:CVCL_0063)
    Bone marrow derived macrophages or L929 cells were seeded on a 12 glass-bottom wells (MatTek Corporation, Ashland, MA 01721, USA), coated with poly-D-Lysine 0.1% (w/v) in water (3×105 cells/well).
    L929
    suggested: None
    Experimental Models: Organisms/Strains
    SentencesResources
    Cell culture: Raw264.7, L929, LA4, Calu3 and VeroE6 cell lines were purchased by American Type Culture Collection and grown according to ATCC recommendations.
    Raw264.7
    suggested: None
    BMDM were obtained from bone marrow of 6-10 week old female C57Bl6 mice (Charles River).
    C57Bl6
    suggested: None
    Recombinant DNA
    SentencesResources
    Generation of LSD1 KO cells by CRISPR/Cas9: The sgRNA oligo (see Reagents table) 10, targeting exon 3 of Lsd1, was cloned into pSpCas9(BB)-2A-GFP, a gift from Feng Zhang (Addgene plasmid # 48138; http://n2t.net/addgene:48138; RRID:Addgene_48138) 52.
    pSpCas9
    suggested: RRID:Addgene_48137)
    detected: RRID:Addgene_48138)
    Forty-eight hours later, GFP-positive cells were single-cell sorted in 96-well plates and after clonal expansion, sublines were screened by Western blot against LSD1. RNAi Knockdown: To knock down LSD1, one short hairpin RNA (shRNA) sequences was tested. shLSD1#1 (see reagents table for sequence) was cloned into the pLKO vector by AgeI–Eco RI double digestion.
    pLKO
    suggested: RRID:Addgene_52920)
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    PolyIC was purchased from Cytiva and dissolved in PBS to a concentration of 1mg/ml.
    PolyIC
    suggested: None
    UV inactivation was performed on ice, using Agilent Genomics/Stratagene Stratalinker 2400 UV Crosslinker, by delivering an energy dose equivalent to 0,3 Joules.
    Agilent Genomics/Stratagene
    suggested: None
    Widefield images of the DAPI and Lysosensor were quantified using a custom-made ImageJ macro.
    ImageJ
    suggested: (ImageJ, RRID:SCR_003070)
    RNA-seq data were mapped using STAR aligner 54 against the mouse genome (mm10).
    STAR
    suggested: (STAR, RRID:SCR_004463)
    Counts were obtained by htseq-counts 55 and differential expression analysis was performed with DESeq2 package hosted in Galaxy online platform 56 using a false discovery rate (FDR) cut-off of 1 x 10-4 9.
    Galaxy
    suggested: (Galaxy, RRID:SCR_006281)
    Then, BAM files for all samples were pooled and the coordinates of mapped reads were intersected (bedtools intersect 57) with those of TEs annotated in RepeatMasker (v405).
    bedtools
    suggested: (BEDTools, RRID:SCR_006646)
    RepeatMasker
    suggested: (RepeatMasker, RRID:SCR_012954)
    Cluster counts for each sample were first normalised using size factors estimated from the number of reads uniquely mapping to Ensembl genes, then differential expression analysis was performed using the Wald Test and a design formula capturing the interaction between DDP treatment and MHV infection status (∼Infection*Treatment).
    Cluster
    suggested: (Cluster, RRID:SCR_013505)
    For the remaining TE clusters, we then plotted the log2 fold changes estimated by DESeq2 as boxplots.
    DESeq2
    suggested: (DESeq, RRID:SCR_000154)
    Viral genome analysis and assembly: To identify the MHV viral strain we used by the SPADES software 60.
    SPADES
    suggested: (SPAdes, RRID:SCR_000131)

    Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your data.


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.