The impact of vaccination on the spread patterns of the COVID epidemic

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

A modified model of the epidemic under conditions of mass vaccination was developed. A comparison of the model results with statistical observations in Israel shows good agreement.

Model calculations are performed on the efficacy of limiting the development of an epidemic by both lockdown and vaccination. Mass vaccination of the population is the most radical method of limiting the growth of the epidemic. The introduction of a lockdown cannot completely prevent the development of an epidemic. The likelihood of the emergence of new strains of the virus is assessed. Without vaccination, the probability of more than two new virus strains per year affecting the epidemic growth process is found to be about 60%. A controlled calculation was made of the effect of the timing of changes in lockdown conditions during the vaccination period on the development of the epidemic. It was particularly shown that the cancellation of the lockdown together with the start of vaccination did not reduce the maximum number of new infections. A controlling calculation was made of the effects of gradually cancelling lockdown. On the basis of these calculations, it is possible to assess the development of the epidemic in different variants of partial lockdown cancellation.

Three dimensionless complexes, made up of the intensities of transmission, vaccination and lockdown restrictions, are found to determine the epidemic’s development.

The intensity of the coronavirus epidemic depends on climatic characteristics, in particular air temperature and the UV index. A relationship is given to estimate the influence of these factors on infection growth.

The way forward for further development of the model is outlined. The immediate goal of modifying the model is to use it for each age group in the population and to find out the links between vaccination rates and the psychological state of the population, i.e. people’s readiness for mass vaccination.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.04.29.21256322: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    NIH rigor criteria are not applicable to paper type.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.


    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.