Changes in English NHS outpatient activity during the early Covid-19 period

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article

Abstract

Objective

To describe changes in NHS outpatient activity connected to the Covid-19 pandemic

Design

Nationwide population-based retrospective study

Setting

England, UK, 31 December 2018 to 25 October 2020

Data source

Outpatient Hospital Episode Statistics data

Results

Between early March and late October 2020, there was a total reduction of 16.6 million outpatient attendances compared to the same period in 2019, equivalent to a 27% decline. The largest weekly drop of 48% relative to 2019 occurred the week beginning 30 March. Activity recovered more slowly than it fell, and by the end of the study period remained 16% lower than the equivalent week in 2019. Changes in patterns of attendances were broadly similar across most patient characteristic groups. There was a substantial increase in the proportion of attendances taking place remotely, peaking at more than one in three during April and May 2020. Differences were observed in trends of remote consultations between age and sex categories, ethnic groups, and proxy deprivation levels. There was also substantial variation in overall activity and use of remote consultations by clinical specialty.

Conclusions

The large increase in remote outpatient consultations during the early Covid-19 period, variations in remote care use by specialty as well as proxy deprivation and ethnic groups all suggest a need to evaluate the impact of these changes particularly in light of national policy to encourage greater use of remote consultations.

SUMMARY BOX

What is already known on this topic

  • Numbers of outpatient attendances in England have increased substantially over recent years.

  • Historically, the vast majority of attendances have been face-to-face, with remote consultations accounting for ∼4% of all attendances.

  • The emergence of the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020 had a large impact on outpatient services in English hospitals, and on health services more generally in England and around the world.

What this study adds

  • There were significant differences by clinical specialty in changes to patterns of attendances and remote consultations.

  • Changes in the volume of outpatient attendances as a result of responses to the pandemic were broadly similar across patient groups.

  • However, there were marked differences across patient groups in trends in remote consultations.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.04.28.21256176: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Ethicsnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.


    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.