Strategies for antigen testing: An alternative approach to widespread PCR testing

  1. Sanjay G. Reddy
  2. Saumya Das

Reviewed by

Read the full article

Listed in

Log in to save this article

Abstract

Multiple applications of low cost and rapid antigen tests for individuals, in parallel (at the same time) or at times sufficiently close to each other, when appropriately interpreted can considerably increase sensitivity of these tests, improving on their performance greatly. Under reasonable assumptions, this occurs when considering a positive to arise in a composite test if at least one of two underlying repeated tests are positive. Parallel Rapid Testing can potentially provide a form of testing that is accessible (combining wide availability and lack of expense) and quick. Moreover, it can provide a level of sensitivity that is comparable to seemingly more sophisticated but more expensive alternatives. In combination with sequential testing, this strategy offers an alternative method of testing that can be applied immediately and on a widespread basis.

Article activity feed

  1. ScreenIT

    SciScore for 10.1101/2021.04.05.21254024: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board Statementnot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).

    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.

    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.

    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.

    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.

  2. Version published to 10.1101/2021.04.05.21254024v1 on medRxiv