A spatial multi-scale fluorescence microscopy toolbox discloses entry checkpoints of SARS-CoV-2 variants in Vero E6 cells

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article

Abstract

We exploited a multi-scale microscopy imaging toolbox to address some major issues related to SARS-CoV-2 interactions with host cells. Our approach harnesses both conventional and super-resolution fluorescence microscopy and easily matches the spatial scale of single-virus/cell checkpoints. We deployed this toolbox to characterize subtle issues related to the entry phase of SARS-CoV-2 variants in Vero E6 cells. Our results suggest that in these cells the variant of concern B.1.1.7, (aka Alpha variant), became the predominant circulating variant in several countries by a clear transmission advantage. In fact, in these cells B.1.1.7 outcompetes its ancestor B.1.177 in terms of a much faster kinetics of entry. Given the cell-entry scenario dominated by the endosomal “late pathway”, the faster internalization of B.1.1.7 could be directly related to the N501Y mutation in the S protein, which is known to strengthen the binding of Spike receptor binding domain with ACE2. Remarkably, we also directly observed the main role of clathrin as mediator of late-entry endocytosis, reconciling it with the membrane localization of the ACE2 receptor previously attributed to caveolin-enriched rafts. Overall, we believe that our fluorescence microscopy-based approach represents a fertile strategy to investigate the molecular features of SARS-CoV-2 interactions with cells.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.03.31.437907: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board Statementnot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power AnalysisIn τ-STED mode, the 775 nm pulsed laser beam is superimposed at a typical power of 100 – 250 mW before the objective.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Cell Line Authenticationnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    Primary antibodies for WB: mouse anti-S (1A9) 1:1000 (GTX632604, GeneTex)
    anti-S
    suggested: None
    GTX632604
    suggested: (GeneTex Cat# GTX632604, RRID:AB_2864418)
    Secondary antibodies for Western blot analysis were HRP-conjugated anti-mouse purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA. Cell infection (unsynchronized) for immunofluorescence study of virus entry: 105 VeroE6 cells were seeded in 35 mm glass bottom dishes (Willco, Amsterdam) with 2 ml of culture medium and cultured for 1 days at 37°C.
    anti-mouse purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology , Inc .
    suggested: None
    Primary antibodies for immunofluorescence studies: Secondary antibodies for immunofluorescence studies and combinations: Immunostaining of infected cells: Methanol-fixed infected cells and a methanol-fixed negative control were incubated overnight at 4 C° with 150 μl of a solution of anti-S IgG or anti-N IgG in PBS + 3% BSA (Sigma-Aldrich, Milan, Italy).
    anti-S IgG
    suggested: None
    anti-N IgG
    suggested: None
    Experimental Models: Cell Lines
    SentencesResources
    Kinetic study of virus growth in cells: VeroE6 cells were seeded in a 24 well plate at 105 cell/well in 1 ml of culture medium and cultured for 1 day at 37°C.
    VeroE6
    suggested: JCRB Cat# JCRB1819, RRID:CVCL_YQ49)
    The cDNA of Caco-2 and HepG2 cells was used as a positive control of TMPRSS2 amplification.
    Caco-2
    suggested: None
    HepG2
    suggested: CLS Cat# 300198/p2277_Hep-G2, RRID:CVCL_0027)
    Immunostaining of non-infected cells: 105 Vero-E6 cells were seeded in 35 mm glass bottom dishes (Willco, Amsterdam) with 2 ml of culture medium and cultured for 1 days at 37°C.
    Vero-E6
    suggested: None
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    The in-house one-step RT-qPCR reaction mixtures were run in a CFX Connect Real-Time PCR instrument (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) using a previously standardized thermal conditions (52.0 °C for 5 min, 95.0 °C for 10 s, 45 cycles of 10 s at 95.0 °C, and 62 °C for 30 s).
    Bio-Rad Laboratories
    suggested: (Bio-Rad Laboratories, RRID:SCR_008426)
    Lysates were quantified, loaded on 4-15% precast protein gels (BIORAD) and proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and electro-blotted onto Hybond-C-Extra (Amersham Biosciences) nitrocellulose membranes.
    BIORAD
    suggested: None
    Colocalization of the green and far-red images was quantified by Pearson’s coefficient R according to the method by Costes et al. 65 by the colocalization threshold and colocalization test routines of Fiji.
    Fiji
    suggested: (Fiji, RRID:SCR_002285)
    Single molecule localization analysis: Acquired dSTORM stacks were processed by Thunderstorm, a Fiji plugin for PALM and STORM data analysis 66.
    STORM
    suggested: (SToRM, RRID:SCR_006696)
    Graphics and statistics: Graphs were prepared using Prism 7 (GraphPad) and IgorPro8 (Wavemetrics) software.
    Prism
    suggested: (PRISM, RRID:SCR_005375)
    GraphPad
    suggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: Please consider improving the rainbow (“jet”) colormap(s) used on page 20. At least one figure is not accessible to readers with colorblindness and/or is not true to the data, i.e. not perceptually uniform.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.