Emerging SARS-CoV-2 mutation hotspots associated with clinical outcomes

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the cause of the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Understanding the influence of mutations in the SARS-CoV-2 gene on clinical outcomes and related factors is critical for treatment and prevention. Here, we analyzed 209,551 high-coverage complete virus sequences and 321 RNA-seq samples to mine the mutations associated with clinical outcome in the SARS-CoV-2 genome. Several important hotspot variants were found to be associated with severe clinical outcomes. Q57H variant in ORF3a protein were found to be associated with higher mortality rate, and was high proportion in severe cases (39.36%) and 501Y.V2 strains (100%) but poorly proportional to asymptomatic cases (10.04%). T265I could change nsp2 structure and mitochondrial permeability, and evidently higher in severe cases (20.12%) and 501Y.V2 strains (100%) but lower in asymptomatic cases (1.43%). Additionally, R203K and G204R could decrease the flexibility and immunogenic property of N protein with high frequency among severe cases, VUI 202012/01 and 484K.V2 strains. Interestingly, the SARS-CoV-2 genome was more susceptible to mutation because of the high frequency of nt14408 mutation (which located in RNA polymerase) and the high expression levels of ADAR and APOBEC in severe clinical outcomes. In conclusion, several important mutation hotspots in the SARS-CoV-2 genome associated with clinical outcomes was found in our study, and that might correlate with different SARS-CoV-2 mortality rates.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.03.31.437666: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board Statementnot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    The overlap of mutations generated by REDItools 2 and JACUSA were considered.
    REDItools
    suggested: (REDItools, RRID:SCR_012133)
    In this study, all samples were processed through a SARS-CoV-2 reference-based assembly pipeline that involved removing non-SARS-CoV-2 reads with Kraken2[22] and aligning to the SARS-CoV-2 reference genome NC_045512.2 by using Samtools[23].
    Kraken2
    suggested: None

    Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your data.


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    However, this research has several limitations. First, the insufficient clinical information on these sequences may have led to missing some mutations associated with clinical outcomes. Second, given that some raw RNA-seq data were unavailable, the relationship between SARS-CoV-2 mutation and clinical outcomes at the patient level was not analyzed. Third, some hotspot mutations lacked experimental proof and thus require experimental verification.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.