Response to Whole-Lung Low-Dose Radiation Therapy (LD-RT) Predicts Freedom from Intubation in Patients Receiving Dexamethasone and/or Remdesevir for COVID-19-Related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

Background

Phase I/II clinical trials have explored whole-lung low-dose radiotherapy (LD-RT) as a potential treatment for patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Initial findings require reproduction. Concomitant LD-RT administration with existing therapies requires safety evaluation.

Methods

Patients with COVID-19-related pneumonia receiving dexamethasone and/or remdesevir were treated with 1.5 Gy whole-lung LD-RT, followed for 28 days or until hospital discharge, and compared to controls blindly matched by age, comorbidity, and disease severity. Eligible patients were hospitalized, SARS-CoV-2 positive, had radiographic consolidations, and required supplemental oxygen. Endpoints included safety, clinical recovery, intubation, radiographic changes, and biomarker response.

Findings

20 patients received whole-lung LD-RT between Jun 11 and Dec 7, 2020 and were compared to controls. Freedom from intubation improved from 68% in controls to 86% following LD-RT (p=0.09) as did C-reactive protein (CRP) (p=0.02) and creatine kinase (CK) (p<0.01) levels, consistent with prior report. Eighty percent of LD-RT patients experienced rapid decline in CRP within 3 days and were classified as LD-RT responders. Intubation-free survival (100% vs 66%, p=0.01) and oxygenation loads were lower in LD-RT responders compared to matched controls: 32% lower per individual (p=0.03) and 56% lower for the cohort (p=0.06). No patient whose CRP declined following LD-RT died or required intubation, whereas all LD-RT non-responders died. Observed reduction of prolonged recoveries and hospitalization times did not reach significance. Radiographic changes were equivalent.

Interpretation

A cohort of patients with COVID-19-related ARDS treated with LD-RT demonstrated superior freedom from intubation compared to matched controls, especially LD-RT responders (p=0.01). LD-RT appears safe to deliver with concurrent drugs. LD-RT lowered CRP and CK biomarkers. CRP response predicted favorable outcome. Optimal timing for LD-RT after oxygen dependence but before intubation may extinguish immunopathology prior to systemic spread. Confirmatory clinical trials are warranted. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04366791 .

Funding

None

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.02.10.21251242: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    EthicsConsent: All participants gave written informed consent prior to any study procedures.
    IRB: The research protocol was approved by the Emory University Institutional Review Board.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    BlindingThereafter, a cohort of age- and comorbidity-matched controls was blindly and retroactively selected for comparative outcome analysis, using methods described previously.9 Twenty new controls were selected among SARS-CoV-2-positive patients who had previously enrolled on a separate, non-therapeutic, prospective institutional trial and matched by age, comorbidity, and disease severity.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Statistical analysis was performed using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC), and statistical significance was two-sided and assessed at the 0.05 level.
    SAS Institute
    suggested: (Statistical Analysis System, RRID:SCR_008567)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    While we have controlled for prior study weaknesses including variations in recovery definitions and transport eligibility, certain limitations remain. These include a non-randomized approach, exploratory intent, small patient numbers, differing control treatments, different laboratory and imaging schedules between the LD-RT and control cohorts, variable times of symptom onset, limited imaging (Figure S2) and serological (Figure S3) studies in the control cohort before intervention and beyond 7 days, and lack of detailed viral load evaluations in the LD-RT and control cohorts. Future work with LD-RT will include confirmatory testing for efficacy using a phase III design, exploration of lower dose ranges, detailed CD-8 T-cell activation studies, CD-4 T cell activation, changes in B-cell profiles, antibody formation, cytokine analysis, and neutralization tests. In summary, this report corroborates prior finding that LD-RT may prevent intubation in COVID-19. Our results show that LD-RT again demonstrated an anti-inflammatory effect in COVID-19 that may lower the risk of mechanical ventilation, the duration of oxygen supplementation, and total hospital recovery time, especially in patients who experience rapid decline in CRP following LD-RT. LD-RT again reduced CRP and CK levels, denoting cardiac protection. Early LD-RT may be protective against downstream elevations in troponin-1, D-dimer, hepatic injury, and cardiac injury. Reduction of CRP following LD-RT may be indicative of ...

    Results from TrialIdentifier: We found the following clinical trial numbers in your paper:

    IdentifierStatusTitle
    NCT04366791SuspendedRadiation Eliminates Storming Cytokines and Unchecked Edema …
    NCT04280705CompletedAdaptive COVID-19 Treatment Trial (ACTT)
    NCT04433949RecruitingBest Supportive Care With or Without Low Dose Whole Lung Rad…


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.