SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence Among Antenatal Clinic Attendees in Kingston, Jamaica, September-November 2020

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in an antenatal population in Kingston, Jamaica was assessed for September-November 2020 in a repeated cross-sectional study using the Abbott Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay. After adjusting for test performance, seroprevalence was 6.9% for September, 16.9% for October, and 24.0% for November. Of the 37 pregnant women testing SARS-CoV-2 IgG positive, only 3 were symptomatic. One symptomatic woman testing SARS-CoV-2 IgG positive had multiple co-morbidities and succumbed to COVID-19 pneumonia. Up to January 31, 2021, 8 women identified as SARS-CoV-2 IgG positive delivered, all without complications. Comparison of test adjusted seroprevalence data with cumulative PCR-confirmed COVID-19 cases within the Kingston Metropolitan Area indicated that as many as 44.4 times more people were infected with SARS-CoV-2 than identified with PCR testing. These findings provide the first evidence for the extent of SARS-CoV-2 infections in Jamaica and will inform future SARS-CoV-2 testing strategies.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.02.08.21251367: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board Statementnot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.


    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from scite Reference Check: We found citations with errata. We recommend checking the errata to confirm that they do not impact the accuracy of your citation.

    DOIStatusTitle
    10.1007/s00134-020-05991-xHas correctionClinical predictors of mortality due to COVID-19 based on an…
    10.1038/s41467-020-17565-yHas correctionPreferential inhibition of adaptive immune system dynamics b…

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.