Impact of the B.1.1.7 variant on neutralizing monoclonal antibodies recognizing diverse epitopes on SARS-CoV-2 Spike

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Abstract

The interaction of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike receptor binding domain (RBD) with the ACE2 receptor on host cells is essential for viral entry. RBD is the dominant target for neutralizing antibodies and several neutralizing epitopes on RBD have been molecularly characterized. Analysis of circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants has revealed mutations arising in the RBD, the N-terminal domain (NTD) and S2 subunits of Spike. To fully understand how these mutations affect the antigenicity of Spike, we have isolated and characterized neutralizing antibodies targeting epitopes beyond the already identified RBD epitopes. Using recombinant Spike as a sorting bait, we isolated >100 Spike-reactive monoclonal antibodies from SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals. ~45% showed neutralizing activity of which ~20% were NTD-specific. None of the S2-specific antibodies showed neutralizing activity. Competition ELISA revealed that NTD-specific mAbs formed two distinct groups: the first group was highly potent against infectious virus, whereas the second was less potent and displayed glycan-dependant neutralization activity. Importantly, mutations present in B.1.1.7 Spike frequently conferred resistance to neutralization by the NTD-specific neutralizing antibodies. This work demonstrates that neutralizing antibodies targeting subdominant epitopes need to be considered when investigating antigenic drift in emerging variants.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.02.03.429355: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board StatementIRB: Both approvals were granted under the terms of the Infectious Disease Biobank’s ethics permission (reference 19/SC/0232) granted by the South Central Hampshire B Research Ethics Committee in 2019.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Cell Line Authenticationnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    Fab/Fc ELISA: 96-well plates (Corning, 3690) were coated with goat anti-human Fc IgG antibody at 3 μg/mL overnight at 4°C.
    anti-human Fc IgG
    suggested: None
    The plates were washed twice in FACS buffer and stained with 50 μl/well of 1:200 dilution of PE-conjugated mouse anti-human IgG Fc antibody (BioLegend) on ice in dark for 1h.
    anti-human IgG
    suggested: None
    Experimental Models: Cell Lines
    SentencesResources
    Biotinylated Spike was expressed in 1L of HEK293F cells (Invitrogen) at a density of 1.5 × 106 cells ml-1.
    HEK293F
    suggested: None
    SARS-CoV-2 (wild-type and mutants) and SARS-CoV pseudotyped virus preparation: Pseudotyped HIV virus incorporating the SARS-Cov-2 wild-type or mutants (D614G, N501Y, D614G+Del69/70 and B.1.1.7) or SARS-CoV spike protein was produced in a 10 cm dish seeded the day prior with 5×106 HEK293T/17 cells in 10 ml of complete Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM-C, 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% Pen/Strep (100 IU/ml penicillin and 100 mg/ml streptomycin)).
    HEK293T/17
    suggested: ATCC Cat# CRL-11268, RRID:CVCL_1926)
    Infectious virus strain and propagation: Vero-E6 cells (Cercopithecus aethiops derived epithelial kidney cells, provided by Prof Wendy Barclay, Imperial College London) cells were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Gibco) supplemented with GlutaMAX, 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 20 μg/mL gentamicin, and incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2.
    Vero-E6
    suggested: None
    The media was removed from the pre-plated Vero-E6 cells and the serum-virus mixtures were added to the Vero E6 cells and incubated at 37°C for 24 h.
    Vero E6
    suggested: None
    Gibson assembly products were directly transfected into HEK-293T cells and transformed under ampicillin selection.
    HEK-293T
    suggested: CCLV Cat# CCLV-RIE 1018, RRID:CVCL_0063)
    IgG expression and purification: Ab heavy and light plasmids were co-transfected at a 1:1 ratio into HEK-293F cells (Thermofisher) using PEI Max 40K (1mg/mL, linear polyethylenimine hydrochloride, Polysciences, Inc.) at a 3:1 ratio (PEI max:DNA).
    HEK-293F
    suggested: RRID:CVCL_6642)
    Monoclonal antibody binding to Spike using flow cytometry: HEK293T cells were plated in a 6-well plate (2×106 cells/well).
    HEK293T
    suggested: None
    HeLa and HeLa-ACE2 cells alone and with SARS-CoV-2 Spike only were used as background and positive controls, respectively.
    HeLa
    suggested: CLS Cat# 300194/p772_HeLa, RRID:CVCL_0030)
    HeLa-ACE2
    suggested: None
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    PBMCs were stained with live/dead (fixable Aqua Dead, Thermofisher), anti-CD3-APC/Cy7 (Biolegend), anti-CD8-APC-Cy7 (Biolegend), anti-CD14-BV510 (Biolegend), anti-CD19-PerCP-Cy5.5 (Biolegend), anti-IgM-PE (Biolegend), anti-IgD-Pacific Blue (Biolegend) and anti-IgG-PeCy7 (BD) and Spike-Alexa488 (Thermofisher Scientific, S32354) and Spike-APC (Thermofisher Scientific, S32362).
    Thermofisher
    suggested: (ThermoFisher; SL 8; Centrifuge, RRID:SCR_020809)
    After another two washes, stained cells were analyzed using flow cytometry, and the binding data were generated by calculating the percent (%) PE-positive cells using FlowJo 10 software.
    FlowJo
    suggested: (FlowJo, RRID:SCR_008520)
    The sequences were aligned with Clustal W and clustered via PhyML to produce maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees which were visualised and annotated using FigTree.
    PhyML
    suggested: (PhyML, RRID:SCR_014629)
    FigTree
    suggested: (FigTree, RRID:SCR_008515)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.