Electronic Computer-Based Model of Combined Ventilation Using a New Medical Device

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article

Abstract

Introduction

The increased demand for mechanical ventilation caused by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic could generate a critical situation where patients may lose access to mechanical ventilators. Combined ventilation, in which two patients are ventilated simultaneously but independently with a single ventilator has been proposed as a life-saving bridge while waiting for new ventilators availability. New devices have emerged to facilitate this task and allow individualization of ventilatory parameters in combined ventilation. In this work we run computer-based electrical simulations of combined ventilation. We introduce an electrical model of a proposed mechanical device which is designed to individualize ventilatory parameters, and tested it under different circumstances.

Materials and Methods

With an electronic circuit simulator applet, an electrical model of combined ventilation is created using resistor-capacitor circuits. A device is added to the electrical model which is capable of individualizing the ventilatory parameters of two patients connected to the same ventilator. Through computational simulation, the model is tested in different scenarios with the aim of achieving adequate ventilation of two subjects under different circumstances: 1) two identical subjects; 2) two subjects with the same size but different lung compliance; and 3) two subjects with different sizes and compliances. The goal is to achieve the established charge per unit of size on each capacitor under different levels of end-expiratory voltage (as an end-expiratory pressure analog). Data collected included capacitor charge, voltage, and charge normalized to the weight of the simulated patient.

Results

Simulations show that it is possible to provide the proper charge to each capacitor under different circumstances using an array of electrical components as equivalents to a proposed mechanical device for combined ventilation. If the pair of connected capacitors have different capacitances, adjustments must be made to the source voltage and/or the resistance of the device to provide the appropriate charge for each capacitor under initial conditions. In pressure control simulation, increasing the end-expiratory voltage on one capacitor requires increasing the source voltage and the device resistance associated with the other simulated patient. On the other hand, in the volume control simulation, it is only required to intervene in the device resistance.

Conclusions

Under simulated conditions, this electrical model allows individualization of combined mechanical ventilation.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.01.17.21249912: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board Statementnot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.


    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    As a general limitation of this ventilation mode, it is not possible to know the volume that will be delivered to the system or to each subject. On the other hand, in VCV mode, a total volume to be delivered must be established, that is, the sum of the Vt of both subjects. This volume is not delivered equally to each subject. It is rather distributed among them according to their RC characteristics, and there is no control over the Pi and the Vt. Although not demonstrated in our simulation, another advantage of PCV mode is that changes in RC characteristics of one subject (i.e. dynamical compliance variability, endotracheal tube obstruction, etc.) do not affect pressurization of the system, and therefore have no consequences on the contralateral subject. On the contrary, in VCV mode, changes in resistance or compliance in one subject directly impact the other subject. In the model, a similar phenomenon is observed when modifying the EEV in one RC circuit. By increasing the EEV in VCV, the contralateral RC circuit receives a greater charge, since it is necessary that the inspiratory lines reach greater voltage to allow charge to be delivered to the RC circuit with greater EEV. In other words, greater proximal voltage is needed to generate a potential difference that allows charge entry into the RC circuit. This is accomplished at the expense of increasing the charge on the capacitor with no modification of the EEV. In contrast, in PCV, the increase in a RC circuit EEV (without...

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.