Ad26.COV2.S-elicited immunity protects against G614 spike variant SARS-CoV-2 infection in Syrian hamsters and does not enhance respiratory disease in challenged animals with breakthrough infection after sub-optimal vaccine dosing

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

Previously we have shown that a single dose of recombinant adenovirus serotype 26 (Ad26) vaccine expressing a prefusion stabilized SARS-CoV-2 spike antigen (Ad26.COV2.S) is immunogenic and provides protection in Syrian hamster and non-human primate SARS-CoV-2 infection models. Here, we investigated the immunogenicity, protective efficacy and potential for vaccine-associated enhanced respiratory disease (VAERD) mediated by Ad26.COV2.S in a moderate disease Syrian hamster challenge model, using the currently most prevalent G614 spike SARS-CoV-2 variant. Vaccine doses of 1×10 9 vp and 1×10 10 vp elicited substantial neutralizing antibodies titers and completely protected over 80% of SARS-CoV-2 inoculated Syrian hamsters from lung infection and pneumonia but not upper respiratory tract infection. A second vaccine dose further increased neutralizing antibody titers which was associated with decreased infectious viral load in the upper respiratory tract after SARS-CoV-2 challenge. Suboptimal non-protective immune responses elicited by low-dose A26.COV2.S vaccination did not exacerbate respiratory disease in SARS-CoV-2-inoculated Syrian hamsters with breakthrough infection. In addition, dosing down the vaccine allowed to establish that binding and neutralizing antibody titers correlate with lower respiratory tract protection probability. Overall, these pre-clinical data confirm efficacy of a 1-dose vaccine regimen with Ad26.COV2.S in this G614 spike SARS-CoV-2 virus variant Syrian hamster model, show the added benefit of a second vaccine dose, and demonstrate that there are no signs of VAERD under conditions of suboptimal immunity.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.01.08.425915: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board Statementnot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Cell Line Authenticationnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    Paraffin sections of lung, trachea and nose sections of all animals were automatically stained (Ventana Discovery Ultra, Roche, France), using rabbit polyclonal anti-SARS-CoV Nucleocapsid protein antibody (NP, Novus NB100-56576, 1/300) which is cross reactive towards SARS-CoV-2 NP.
    anti-SARS-CoV Nucleocapsid protein
    suggested: (Creative Diagnostics Cat# DMAB8869, RRID:AB_2392503)
    NP
    suggested: None
    Experimental Models: Cell Lines
    SentencesResources
    To this end, serial dilutions of the samples (throat swabs, and tissue homogenates) were made and incubated on Vero E6 monolayers for 1 hour at 37 °C.
    Vero E6
    suggested: None
    Vero-E6 cells were seeded at 12,000 cells/well in 96-well tissue culture plates 1 day prior to infection.
    Vero-E6
    suggested: None
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC, US) and R version 3.6.1 (2019-07-05).
    SAS Institute
    suggested: (Statistical Analysis System, RRID:SCR_008567)
    From the binding and neutralizing antibody data pooled from different regimens and dose levels of Ad26.COV2.S, logistic regression models were built with Firth’s correction49, with protection outcome as the dependent variable, and the wtVNA and Log10 transformed ELISA data before inoculation as the independent variable.
    Firth’s
    suggested: None

    Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your data.


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: We found the following clinical trial numbers in your paper:

    IdentifierStatusTitle
    NCT04505722Active, not recruitingA Study of Ad26.COV2.S for the Prevention of SARS-CoV-2-Medi…
    NCT04614948RecruitingA Study of Ad26.COV2.S for the Prevention of SARS-CoV-2-medi…


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.