Current state of COVID-19 knowledge, attitude, practices, and associated factors among Bangladeshi food handlers from various food industries
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
While people around the world are terrified of the global pandemic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and are dying for a permanent solution, undertaking preventive safety measures are said to be the most effective way to stay away from it. People’s adherences to these measures are broadly dependent on their knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAP). People working in the food industries must be extra cautious during this time because they are in close proximity to consumable items. The present study was designed to evaluate food handlers’ knowledge, attitude, and practices regarding COVID-19 in different food industries in Bangladesh. A number of 400 food handlers from 15 food industries took part in this online-based study. The information was collected from the participants through a questionnaire prepared in Google form. With a correct response rate of about 90% on average (knowledge 89.7%, attitude 93%, practices 88.2%), the participants showed an acceptable of KAP regarding COVID-19. Education and working experiences had a significant association with the total KAP scores (p < 0.05). The findings may assist public health professionals and practitioners in developing targeted strategies for implementing such studies in other industrial sectors and taking appropriate measures based on the KAP studies.
Article activity feed
-
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.01.06.21249118: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources SPSS version 16.0 was used for statistical analysis. SPSSsuggested: (SPSS, RRID:SCR_002865)Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical …
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.01.06.21249118: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources SPSS version 16.0 was used for statistical analysis. SPSSsuggested: (SPSS, RRID:SCR_002865)Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
-