Rapid, point-of-care molecular diagnostics with Cas13
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
Rapid nucleic acid testing is a critical component of a robust infrastructure for increased disease surveillance. Here, we report a microfluidic platform for point-of-care, CRISPR-based molecular diagnostics. We first developed a nucleic acid test which pairs distinct mechanisms of DNA and RNA amplification optimized for high sensitivity and rapid kinetics, linked to Cas13 detection for specificity. We combined this workflow with an extraction-free sample lysis protocol using shelf-stable reagents that are widely available at low cost, and a multiplexed human gene control for calling negative test results. As a proof-of-concept, we demonstrate sensitivity down to 40 copies/μL of SARS-CoV-2 in unextracted saliva within 35 minutes, and validated the test on total RNA extracted from patient nasal swabs with a range of qPCR Ct values from 13-35. To enable sample-to-answer testing, we integrated this diagnostic reaction with a single-use, gravity-driven microfluidic cartridge followed by real-time fluorescent detection in a compact companion instrument. We envision this approach for Diagnostics with Coronavirus Enzymatic Reporting (DISCoVER) will incentivize frequent, fast, and easy testing.
Article activity feed
-
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2020.12.14.20247874: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar …
SciScore for 10.1101/2020.12.14.20247874: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
-