SARS-CoV-2 in Brazil: analysis of molecular variance and genetic diversity in viral haplotypes found in the states of Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Paraná and Tocantins
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
In this work, 18 sequences of the SARS-CoV-2 virus were used, from four Brazilian states (Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Paraná and Tocantins) with 09, 04, 04, 8 and 01 haplotypes, respectively, with lengths ranging from 234 to 29,903 bp. All sequences were publicly available on the National Biotechnology Information Center (NCBI) platform and were previously aligned with the MEGA X software, where all gaps and ambiguous sites were extracted for the construction of the phylogenetic tree. Of the 301 sites analyzed, 68% varied, 131 of which were parsimonium-informative sites. Phylogenetic analyses revealed the presence of two distinct subgroups, corroborated by the high F ST (80%). The high degree of polymorphism found among these samples helped to establish a clear pattern of non-genetic structuring, based on the time of divergence between the groups. All molecular variance estimators confirmed that there was no consensus in the conservation of the studied sequences, also indicating a high variation for the protein products of the virus. In a highly miscegenational and diverse population such as the Brazilian population, this observation draws our attention to the need for an urgent increase in public health actions, awareness strategies, hygiene and distancing practices and not the other way around.
Article activity feed
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2020.12.02.409037: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources The sequences were aligned using the MEGA X program (TAMURA et al., 2018) and the gaps were extracted for the construction of phylogenetic trees. MEGA Xsuggested: NoneResults from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors …SciScore for 10.1101/2020.12.02.409037: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources The sequences were aligned using the MEGA X program (TAMURA et al., 2018) and the gaps were extracted for the construction of phylogenetic trees. MEGA Xsuggested: NoneResults from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No funding statement was detected.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
-
