Repurposing the Ebola and Marburg Virus Inhibitors Tilorone, Quinacrine and Pyronaridine: In vitro Activity Against SARS-CoV-2 and Potential Mechanisms
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 is a newly identified virus that has resulted in over 1.3 M deaths globally and over 59 M cases globally to date. Small molecule inhibitors that reverse disease severity have proven difficult to discover. One of the key approaches that has been widely applied in an effort to speed up the translation of drugs is drug repurposing. A few drugs have shown in vitro activity against Ebola virus and demonstrated activity against SARS-CoV-2 in vivo . Most notably the RNA polymerase targeting remdesivir demonstrated activity in vitro and efficacy in the early stage of the disease in humans. Testing other small molecule drugs that are active against Ebola virus would seem a reasonable strategy to evaluate their potential for SARS-CoV-2. We have previously repurposed pyronaridine, tilorone and quinacrine (from malaria, influenza, and antiprotozoal uses, respectively) as inhibitors of Ebola and Marburg virus in vitro in HeLa cells and of mouse adapted Ebola virus in mouse in vivo . We have now tested these three drugs in various cell lines (VeroE6, Vero76, Caco-2, Calu-3, A549-ACE2, HUH-7 and monocytes) infected with SARS-CoV-2 as well as other viruses (including MHV and HCoV 229E). The compilation of these results indicated considerable variability in antiviral activity observed across cell lines. We found that tilorone and pyronaridine inhibited the virus replication in A549-ACE2 cells with IC 50 values of 180 nM and IC 50 198 nM, respectively. We have also tested them in a pseudovirus assay and used microscale thermophoresis to test the binding of these molecules to the spike protein. They bind to spike RBD protein with K d values of 339 nM and 647 nM, respectively. Human C max for pyronaridine and quinacrine is greater than the IC 50 hence justifying in vivo evaluation. We also provide novel insights into their mechanism which is likely lysosomotropic.
Article activity feed
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2020.12.01.407361: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:Despite this limitation, valuable information about the virus infection and replication can be learned from studies using these cell lines. A previous study (Chu et al., 2020) assessed 25 cell lines derived from different tissues …
SciScore for 10.1101/2020.12.01.407361: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:Despite this limitation, valuable information about the virus infection and replication can be learned from studies using these cell lines. A previous study (Chu et al., 2020) assessed 25 cell lines derived from different tissues or organs and host species and reported that cytopathic effects were only seen in VeroE6 and FRhK4 cells after SARS-CoV-2 inoculation for up to 120 hpi. These findings are important for optimization of antiviral assays based on cell protection assessment, because cell lines without obvious cytopathic effects might lead to overestimation of cell viability and drug efficacy (Chu et al., 2020). For efficient SARS-CoV-2 research, a cell line, such as Vero cells, that can easily replicate and isolate the virus is essential, but they have been shown not to produce interferon (IFN) when infected with Newcastle disease virus, rubella virus, and other viruses (Desmyter et al., 1968). Under previously described experimental conditions, productive SARS-CoV-2 replication in A549 cells was erratic (Sacramento et al., 2020) which can be overcome by preparing A549 cells overexpressing ACE2 (as used in the current study). The differences in responses in different cell lines could be accounted for by the basic biochemistry, for example hepatic cells, like Huh-7, are equipped with enzymes to synthesize nucleotides, carbohydrates and lipids (Nwosu et al., 2018). Hence it is not surprising that the highest potency of remdesivir against SARS-CoV-2 is found in Huh-7 cells...
Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
-
