Assessment of protein-protein interfaces in cryo-EM derived assemblies

  1. Sony Malhotra
  2. Agnel Praveen Joseph
  3. Jeyan Thiyagalingam
  4. Maya Topf

Reviewed by

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

Log in to save this article

Abstract

Structures of macromolecular assemblies derived from cryo-EM maps often contain errors that become more abundant with decreasing resolution. Despite efforts in the cryo-EM community to develop metrics for the map and atomistic model validation, thus far, no specific scoring metrics have been applied systematically to assess the interface between the assembly subunits. Here, we have assessed protein-protein interfaces in macromolecular assemblies derived by cryo-EM. To this end, we developed PI-score, a density-independent machine learning-based metric, trained using protein-protein interfaces’ features in high-resolution crystal structures. Using PI-score, we were able to identify errors at interfaces in the PDB-deposited cryo-EM structures (including SARS-CoV-2 complexes) and in the models submitted for cryo-EM targets in CASP13 and the EM model challenge. Some of the identified errors, especially at medium-to-low resolution structures, were not captured by density-based assessment scores. Our method can therefore provide a powerful complementary assessment tool for the increasing number of complexes solved by cryo-EM.

Article activity feed

  1. ScreenIT

    SciScore for 10.1101/2020.11.17.387068: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    NIH rigor criteria are not applicable to paper type.

    Table 2: Resources

    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    We used the sklearn Python package with default parameter settings.
    Python
    suggested: (IPython, RRID:SCR_001658)

    Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your data.

    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.

    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.

    Results from JetFighter: Please consider improving the rainbow (“jet”) colormap(s) used on pages 46 and 47. At least one figure is not accessible to readers with colorblindness and/or is not true to the data, i.e. not perceptually uniform.

    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.

  2. Version published to 10.1101/2020.11.17.387068 on bioRxiv