Local topology, bifurcations and mutation hot-spots in proteins with SARS-CoV-2 spike protein as an example

  1. Xubiao Peng
  2. Antti J Niemi

Reviewed by

Read the full article

Listed in

Log in to save this article

Abstract

Novel topological methods are introduced to protein research. The aim is to identify hot-spot sites where a bifurcation can change the local topology of the protein backbone. Since the shape of a protein is intimately related to its biological function, a mutation that takes place at such a bifurcation hot-spot has an enhanced capacity to change the protein’s biological function. The methodology applies to any protein but it is developed with the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein as a timely example. First, topological criteria are introduced to identify and classify potential mutation hot-spot sites along the protein backbone. Then, the expected outcome of a substitution mutation is estimated for a general class of hot-spots, by a comparative analysis of the backbone segments that surround the hot-spot sites. This analysis employs the statistics of commensurable amino acid fragments in the Protein Data Bank, in combination with general stereochemical considerations. It is observed that the notorious D614G substitution of the spike protein is a good example of such a mutation hot-spot. Several topologically similar examples are then analyzed in detail, some of them are even better candidates for a mutation hot-spot than D614G. The local topology of the recently observed N501Y mutation is also inspected, and it is found that this site is prone to a different kind of local topology changing bifurcation.

Article activity feed

  1. Version published to 10.1101/2020.11.11.378828v3 on bioRxiv
  2. Version published to 10.1101/2020.11.11.378828v2 on bioRxiv
  3. ScreenIT

    SciScore for 10.1101/2020.11.11.378828: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    NIH rigor criteria are not applicable to paper type.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.

    Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your data.

    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.

    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.

    Results from JetFighter: Please consider improving the rainbow (“jet”) colormap(s) used on pages 17, 18 and 15. At least one figure is not accessible to readers with colorblindness and/or is not true to the data, i.e. not perceptually uniform.

    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.

  4. Version published to 10.1101/2020.11.11.378828v1 on bioRxiv