Susceptibility of well-differentiated airway epithelial cell cultures from domestic and wildlife animals to SARS-CoV-2

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has spread globally, and the number of cases continues to rise all over the world. Besides humans, the zoonotic origin, as well as intermediate and potential spillback host reservoirs of SARS-CoV-2 are unknown. To circumvent ethical and experimental constraints, and more importantly, to reduce and refine animal experimentation, we employed our airway epithelial cell (AEC) culture repository composed of various domesticated and wildlife animal species to assess their susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2. In this study, we inoculated well-differentiated animal AEC cultures of monkey, cat, ferret, dog, rabbit, pig, cattle, goat, llama, camel, and two neotropical bat species with SARS-CoV-2. We observed that SARS-CoV-2 only replicated efficiently in monkey and cat AEC culture models. Whole-genome sequencing of progeny virus revealed no obvious signs of nucleotide transitions required for SARS-CoV-2 to productively infect monkey and cat epithelial airway cells. Our findings, together with the previously reported human-to-animal spillover events warrants close surveillance to understand the potential role of cats, monkeys, and closely related species as spillback reservoirs for SARS-CoV-2.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.11.10.374587: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board Statementnot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Cell Line Authenticationnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    For the detection of SARS-CoV-2, fixed animal AEC cultures were incubated with a rabbit polyclonal antibody against SARS-CoV Nucleocapsid protein (Rockland, 200-401-A50), which has previously been shown to cross-react with SARS-CoV-2 20.
    antibody against SARS-CoV Nucleocapsid protein
    suggested: None
    To visualize the distribution of ACE2 in the AEC cultures, a rabbit polyclonal antibody against ACE2 (ab15348, Abcam) was used.
    ACE2
    suggested: (Abcam Cat# ab15348, RRID:AB_301861)
    Alexa Fluor® 488-labeled donkey anti-Rabbit and -mouse IgG (H + L) (Jackson Immunoresearch) were used as secondary antibodies.
    anti-Rabbit
    suggested: None
    Experimental Models: Cell Lines
    SentencesResources
    Conventional cell culture: Vero E6 cells (kindly provided by Doreen Muth, Marcel Müller, and Christian Drosten, Charité, Berlin, Germany) were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 1x GlutaMAX, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, 100 IU/ml penicillin, 1% (v/v) non-essential amino acids, and 15 mM HEPES (Gibco).
    Vero E6
    suggested: RRID:CVCL_XD71)
    The viral titer was determined by TCID50 assay on MDCK-II cells as described previously 41,42.
    MDCK-II
    suggested: None
    Virus stocks were propagated in the human rectal tumor cell line HRT-18G (CRL11663, ATCC) for 96 hours in the infection medium, with the adjustment of using 0,25 μg/ml of trypsin.
    HRT-18G
    suggested: ATCC Cat# CRL-11663, RRID:CVCL_2515)
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    All images were processed using Fiji software packages 44.
    Fiji
    suggested: (Fiji, RRID:SCR_002285)
    The protein alignment was performed using ClustalW in Geneious 11.1.5.
    ClustalW
    suggested: (ClustalW, RRID:SCR_017277)
    Whole-Genome Sequencing using Oxford Nanopore (MinION): Sequencing was performed on viral RNA isolated from the SARS-CoV-2 stock and the 96 hpi apical washes of SARS-CoV-2-infected monkey and cat AEC cultures according to the ARTIC platform nCoV19 protocols 48,49.
    Oxford Nanopore
    suggested: (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, RRID:SCR_003756)
    Sequencing libraries were generated using the Native Barcoding Expansion 96 kit (EXP-NBD196, Oxford Nanopore Technologies) and sequenced on a MinION R9.4.1 flowcell according to the manufacturer's instructions for a duration of 48 hours.
    MinION
    suggested: (MinION, RRID:SCR_017985)
    Consensus sequences were aligned and further analyzed in Geneious 11.1.5.
    Geneious
    suggested: (Geneious, RRID:SCR_010519)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We found bar graphs of continuous data. We recommend replacing bar graphs with more informative graphics, as many different datasets can lead to the same bar graph. The actual data may suggest different conclusions from the summary statistics. For more information, please see Weissgerber et al (2015).


    Results from JetFighter: Please consider improving the rainbow (“jet”) colormap(s) used on page 18. At least one figure is not accessible to readers with colorblindness and/or is not true to the data, i.e. not perceptually uniform.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.