Genetic diversity analysis of the D614G mutation in SARS-CoV-2

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

In this work, we evaluated the levels of genetic diversity in 18 genomes of SARS-CoV-2 carrying the D614G mutation, coming from Malaysia and Venezuela and publicly available at the National Center of Biotechnology and Information (NCBI). These haplotypes were previously used for phylogenetic analysis, following the LaBECom protocols. All gaps and unconserved sites were extracted for the construction of a phylogenetic tree. As specific methodologies for paired FST estimators, Molecular Variance (AMOVA), Genetic Distance, mismatch, demographic and spatial expansion analyses, molecular diversity and evolutionary divergence time analyses, 20,000 random permutations were always used. The results revealed the presence of only 57 sites of polymorphic and parsimonium-informative among the 29,827bp analyzed and the analyses based on F ST values confirmed the presence of two distinct genetic entities with fixation index of 22% and with a higher component of population variation (78.14%). Tau variations revealed a significant time of divergence, supported by mismatch analysis of the observed distribution (τ = 42%). It is safe to say that the small number of existing polymorphisms should not reflect major changes in the protein products of viral populations in both countries and this consideration provides the safety that, although there are differences in the haplotypes studied, these differences are minimal for both regions analyzed geographically and, therefore, it seems safe to extrapolate the levels of polymorphism and molecular diversity found in the samples for other mutant genomes of SARS-CoV-2 in other countries. This reduces speculation about the possibility of large differences between mutant strains of SARS-CoV-2 (D614G) and wild strains, at least at the level of their protein products, although the mutant form has higher transmission speed and infection. The analyses suggest that possible variations in protein products, of the wild virus in relation to its mutant form, should be minimal, bringing peace of mind as to the increased risk of death from the new form of the virus, as well as possible problems of gradual adjustments in some molecular targets for vaccines.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.10.30.362954: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board Statementnot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.


    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No funding statement was detected.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.