Extracellular vesicle-based vaccine platform displaying native viral envelope proteins elicits a robust anti-SARS-CoV-2 response in mice

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) emerge as essential mediators of intercellular communication. DNA vaccines encoding antigens presented on EVs efficiently induce T-cell responses and EV-based vaccines containing the Spike (S) proteins of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (SARS-CoV) are highly immunogenic in mice. Thus, EVs may serve as vaccine platforms against emerging diseases, going beyond traditional strategies, with the antigen displayed identically to the original protein embedded in the viral membrane and presented as such to the immune system. Compared to their viral and pseudotyped counterparts, EV-based vaccines overcome many safety issues including pre-existing immunity against these vectors. Here, we applied our technology in natural EV’s engineering, to express the S proteins of SARS-CoV-2 embedded in the EVs, which mimic the virus with its fully native spikes. Immunizations with a two component CoVEVax vaccine, comprising DNA vector (DNA S-EV ) primes, allowing in situ production of Spike harbouring EVs, and a boost using S-EVs produced in mammalian cells, trigger potent neutralizing and cellular responses in mice, in the absence of any adjuvants. CoVEVax would be the prototype of vaccines, where the sole exchange of the envelope proteins on EVs leads to the generation of new vaccine candidates against emerging viruses.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.10.28.357137: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board StatementIRB: Ethics statement: All animal studies were performed in accordance with national regulations and approved prior to experimentation by the Ethics Committee for Animal Testing Languedoc-Roussillon (national agreement CEEA-036) and French Ministry of Research with the reference APAFIS #24869 (10 April 2020).
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variableMice and study design: Female BALB/cAnNCrl mice, 6 weeks old, were purchased from Charles River-Italy and placed into four groups of n=6.
    Cell Line AuthenticationContamination: HEK293T cells were routinely tested and found negative by MycoAlert™ mycoplasma detection kit (Lonza Nottingham, Ltd.)

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    Tetraspanin kit chips (EV-TETRA-C), with capture antibodies against CD81, CD63, CD9 and control IgG (MIgG), were used to detect EVs.
    CD81
    suggested: None
    CD63 , CD9
    suggested: None
    control IgG
    suggested: None
    EVs (1010 EVs/ml) were coated on chips, then probed with detection antibodies provided with the kit (CD81/CF55, CD63/CF647, CD9 CF488A) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
    CD9
    suggested: None
    The immunodetection of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein was performed with primary antibodies against either S1 domain (SARS-CoV-2 Spike S1, rabbit monoclonal antibody [HL6], GTX635654, Genetex), or S2 domain (SARS-CoV-2 Spike S2, mouse monoclonal antibody [1A9], GTX632604, Genetex), or CilPP (in-house antibody raised in rabbit).
    GTX635654
    suggested: (GeneTex Cat# GTX635654, RRID:AB_2888548)
    in-house
    suggested: None
    Membranes were then incubated with the corresponding secondary HRP-conjugated antibodies (donkey anti-mouse or anti-rabbit HRP, #715-035-150 or #711-035-152 from Jackson ImmunoResearch); the signals were detected using an enhanced chemiluminescence detection kit (Super Signal West Pico Plus, 34580, ThermoFischer Scientific) and membranes imaged with ChemiDoc Imaging System (Bio-Rad).
    anti-rabbit HRP
    suggested: (Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs Cat# 711-035-152, RRID:AB_10015282)
    The same anti-S1 and anti-S2 antibodies as well secondary antibodies were also used to detect the Spike protein on EVs by ELISA (see protocol below).
    anti-S2
    suggested: None
    S1/S2 and antigen specific IgG ELISA: SARS-CoV-2 specific antibody titers of sera were determined by ELISA.
    antigen specific IgG
    suggested: None
    This was followed by 3 washes with 200 μl of 1X PBS per well and incubation with 100 μl per well of secondary donkey anti-mouse HRP conjugated antibody diluted 1:10,000 in 3% BSA in 1X PBS.
    anti-mouse HRP
    suggested: None
    Saturation was performed with 3% BSA in 1X PBS and followed by incubation with dilutions of either anti-S1 or S2 antibodies.
    anti-S1
    suggested: None
    Secondary HRP-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit and anti-mouse antibodies were used, respectively.
    anti-rabbit
    suggested: None
    anti-mouse
    suggested: None
    Experimental Models: Cell Lines
    SentencesResources
    HEK293T cells were routinely tested and found negative by MycoAlert™ mycoplasma detection kit (Lonza Nottingham, Ltd.)
    HEK293T
    suggested: NCBI_Iran Cat# C498, RRID:CVCL_0063)
    Experimental Models: Organisms/Strains
    SentencesResources
    Mice and study design: Female BALB/cAnNCrl mice, 6 weeks old, were purchased from Charles River-Italy and placed into four groups of n=6.
    BALB/cAnNCrl
    suggested: RRID:IMSR_CRL:028)
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Luc.R-E-luciferase reporter vector from NIH-AIDS Reagent Program [24] and exchanged the luciferase gene by the Nano Luciferase gene (named hereafter pNL4-3.
    NIH-AIDS Reagent Program
    suggested: None
    Protein sequence alignment: Multiple sequence alignment was performed with Clustal Omega tool (EMBL-EBI).
    Clustal Omega
    suggested: (Clustal Omega, RRID:SCR_001591)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    Despite the fact that they are well characterized, it is clear now that one of their major limitations is the natural, pre-existing immunity against these vectors [33, 34]. Likely, all primarily vaccinated hosts will mount an anti-adenovirus immune response that will hamper a strong anti-SARS-CoV-2 response after a second injection. As a consequence, adenoviral vectors from other species or with a lower seroprevalence in humans must be explored as vaccine carriers [30, 32, 35]. One of the major concerns with emerging viruses is the threat of re-infections in the general population lacking a long-lasting immunity contributing to the virus becoming endemic, which in turn may be linked with increased mutational-rate, as in the case of influenza virus, necessitating yearly vaccination campaigns. Due to the high immunogenicity of viral vectors themselves multiple immunizations with such platforms could prove challenging, if not inefficient. EV antigenic display can overcome this problem. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that an antigen embedded in the membrane of EVs is more immunogenic and triggers a higher humoral response in vivo when compared with human (Ad5) and non-human (ChAdOx1) adenoviral vectors, both proposed as vaccine platforms against SARS-CoV-2 [36]. The immune responses observed upon CoVEVax administration in vivo are directed against both S1 an S2 parts of the Spike protein, which is important for a broad coverage of the vaccine in regard to the high conservatio...

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.