Codon usage pattern reveals SARS-CoV-2 as a monomorphic pathogen of hybrid origin with role of silent mutations in rapid evolutionary success
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
Viruses are dependent on the host tRNA pool, and an optimum codon usage pattern (CUP) is the driving force in its evolution. Systematic analysis of CUP of the coding sequences (CDS) of representative major pangolin lineages A and B of SARS-CoV-2 indicate a single transmission event of a codon-optimized virus from its source into humans. Here, no direct congruence could be detected in CUP of all CDS of SARS-CoV-2 with the non-human natural SARS viruses further reiterating its novelty. Several CDS show similar CUP with bat or pangolin, while others have distinct CUP pointing towards a possible hybrid nature of the virus. At the same time, phylogenetic diversity suggests the role of even silent mutations in its success by adapting to host tRNA pool. However, genomes of SARS-CoV-2 from primary infections are required to investigate the origins amongst the competing natural or lab leak theories.
Article activity feed
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2020.10.12.335521: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar …
SciScore for 10.1101/2020.10.12.335521: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No funding statement was detected.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
-