Serological surveys to inform SARS-CoV-2 epidemic curve: a cross-sectional study from Odisha, India

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

This was a population based cross-sectional study carried out to estimate and compare the seroprevalence, hidden prevalence and determine the demographic risk factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection among adults in the three largest cities of Odisha, India, and ascertain the association with the progression of the epidemic. The survey carried out in August 2020 in the three largest cities of the state of Odisha, India. Blood samples were collected from the residents using random sampling methods and tested for anti- SARS CoV-2 antibodies using an automated CLIA platform. A total of 4146 participants from the 3 cities of Bhubaneswar (BBS), Berhampur (BAM) and Rourkela (RKL) participated. The female to male participation ratio was 5.9:10 across the three cities. The gender weighted seroprevalence across the three cities was 20.78% (95% CI 19.56–22.05%). While females reported a higher seroprevalence (22.8%) as compared to males (18.8%), there was no significant difference in seroprevalence across age groups. A majority of the seropositive participants were asymptomatic (90.49%). The case to infection ratio on the date of serosurvey was 1:6.6 in BBS, 1:61 in BAM and 1:29.8 in RKL. The study found a high seroprevalence against COVID-19 in urban Odisha as well as high numbers of asymptomatic infections. The epidemic curves had a correlation with the seroprevalence.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.10.11.20210807: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board Statementnot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.


    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    Our study had a few limitations. The participants were only adults and the non-response rate was high (17.4%), and hence, the possibility of selection bias cannot be excluded. The non response was higher among females probably due to cultural factors and higher individual apprehensions towards blood sample collection. The study reported on the prevalence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 at a point in time. Follow up data on anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in the same subjects will be required to understand the duration of immunity to natural infection as well as protection against reinfection. Serial cross-sectional serosurevs have been planned in the same population to address this issue and estimate the rate of spread of COVID-19 infection in Odisha. To conclude, our study found a high seroprevalence against COVID-19 in urban Odisha. Future studies integrating the seroprevalence data with sociocultural and other biological data will help us better understand the dynamics of COVID-19 transmission and the susceptibility to infection at the individual and community level. It will also help us understand the effectiveness of the several steps undertaken by the state and central Government such as social distancing, usage of masks, etc, in preventing the spread of COVID-19 infection in the community. However, we should be careful while interpreting the findings of a seroprevalence study. There is still no concrete data to support the fact that presence of antibodies against COVID-19 ...

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a protocol registration statement.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.