Chest pain presentations to hospital during the COVID-19 lockdown: Lessons for public health media campaigns
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
Emergency Department (ED) attendances with chest pain reduced during the COVID-19 lockdown. We performed a service evaluation project in NHS Lothian to explore how and why the COVID-19 pandemic and public health advice had affected chest pain presentations and help-seeking behaviour at an individual patient level using a qualitative interview approach.
Methods
We carried out 28 semi-structured telephone interviews with a convenience sample of patients who presented with chest pain during lockdown and in patients with known coronary heart disease under the outpatient care of a cardiologist in April and May 2020. Interviews were audio recorded and voice files listened to while making detailed notes. Salient themes and issues were documented as verbatim extracts. Interviews were analysed thematically.
Results
Patient interviews revealed three main themes. 1) pandemic help-seeking behaviour; describing how participants made the decision to seek professional healthcare assessment. 2) COVID-19 exposure concerns; describing how the subthemes of perceived vulnerability, wishing to protect others and adding pressure to the health service shaped their decision making for an episode of acute chest pain. 3) hospital experience; describing the difference between the imagined and actual experience in hospital.
Conclusions
Qualitative interviews revealed how the pandemic shaped help-seeking practices, how patients interpreted their personal vulnerability to the virus, and described patient experience of attending hospital for assessment during this time. As patient numbers presenting to hospital appeared to mirror public health messaging, dynamic monitoring of this messaging should evaluate public response to healthcare campaigns to ensure the net impact on health, pandemic and non-pandemic related, is optimised.
Article activity feed
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2020.10.05.20203687: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable All interviews were conducted by AVF (a female cardiology research nurse with experience in qualitative interviewing) and lasted 5 to 37 minutes (mean 12 minutes). Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:Limitations: We were unable to access the experience of people who chose not …
SciScore for 10.1101/2020.10.05.20203687: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable All interviews were conducted by AVF (a female cardiology research nurse with experience in qualitative interviewing) and lasted 5 to 37 minutes (mean 12 minutes). Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:Limitations: We were unable to access the experience of people who chose not to attend hospital with symptoms of chest pain, however, this service evaluation project has revealed valuable insights into how the decision to attend hospital was shaped by the pandemic. The first interviews were carried out at or just after the time of the release of a public health messaging campaign to promote attendance to the Emergency Department for urgent conditions. While some interviews included participants who had experienced symptoms two weeks earlier, perceived decision making may have changed in response to this new campaign. We did not explore factors influencing help seeking behaviour and hospital attendance during the early messages advising patients to stay at home and protect the NHS.
Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
-
