Initial Model for USA CoVID-19 Resurgence

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

Early CoVID-19 growth obeys: , with K o = [(ln 2)/( t dbl )], where t dbl is the pandemic growth doubling time . Given , the daily number of new CoVID-19 cases is . Implementing society-wide Social Distancing increases the t dbl doubling time , and a linear function of time for t dbl was used in our Initial Model : to describe these changes, where the [t]-axis is time-shifted from the –axis back to the pandemic start, and G o ≡ [ K A / γ o ]. While this N o [t] successfully modeled the USA CoVID-19 progress from 3/2020 to 6/2020, this equation could not easily model some quickly decreasing ρ [ t ] cases (“ fast pandemic shutoff “), indicating that a second process was involved. This situation was most evident in the initial CoVID-19 data from China, South Korea , and Italy . Modifying Z o [ t ] to allow exponential cutoffs: resulted in an Enhanced Initial Model (EIM) that significantly improved data fits for these cases.

After 6/2020, many regions of the USA “ opened up ”, loosening their Social Distancing requirements, which led to a sudden USA CoVID-19 Resurgence . Extrapolating the USA N o [ t ] 3/2020-6/2020 results to 9/2020 as an Initial Model Baseline (IMB) , and subtracting this IMB from the newer USA data gives a Resurgence Only function, which is analyzed here. This USA CoVID-19 Resurgence function differs significantly from the N o [t] IMB functional form, but it was well-modeled by the N A [ t ] fast pandemic shutoff function. These results indicate that: (a) the gradual increase in t dbl doubling time from society-wide shut-downs is likely due to eliminating of a large number of population gathering points that could have enabled CoVID-19 spread; and (b) having a non-zero δ o fast pandemic shutoff is likely due to more people wearing masks more often [with 12 Figures ].

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.09.16.20196063: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board Statementnot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.


    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.