The impact of asthma on mental health and wellbeing during COVID-19 lockdown

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.09.10.20190793: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board Statementnot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variableStudy Samples: The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) is an ongoing longitudinal population-based study that recruited pregnant women residing in Avon in the south-west of England with expected delivery dates between 1st April 1991 and 31st December 1992 [11, 12].

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.


    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    Strengths & Limitations: The strength of our study lies in the detailed data from the large ALSPAC population. The longitudinal data has provided not just a snapshot of the state of mind of the population during the crisis but has allowed us to assess its development from a pre-pandemic baseline state. The detailed questionnaires also provide us with details about specific concerns during lockdown. There are limitations to our data. Asthma diagnoses were self-reported, so may over- or under-represent the true asthma population within the group. Whilst this might confound the effect of the physical symptoms of asthma on mental health during the pandemic, it will not affect the psychological outcome of those carrying the label of an asthma diagnosis that is central to our hypothesis. Furthermore, we have evidence of the validity of the self-reported asthma in ALSPAC [29]. The ALSPAC-G0 pre-pandemic assessments of anxiety and depression were made using different assessment tools to those used in the COVID-19 assessment, but we have still managed to assess the mental state of this population over time. It is difficult to say whether the increase in anxiety and decrease in mental wellbeing in the participants with asthma translates to a significant pathological effect. We do not have data regarding healthcare utilisation of the cohorts pre- and post-lockdown. We are unsure whether people have sought help for their asthma or mental health issues, or whether there has been reduced c...

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.