Prime-boost protein subunit vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 are highly immunogenic in mice and macaques

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are advancing into human clinical trials, with emphasis on eliciting high titres of neutralising antibodies against the viral spike (S). However, the merits of broadly targeting S versus focusing antibody onto the smaller receptor binding domain (RBD) are unclear. Here we assessed prototypic S and RBD subunit vaccines in homologous or heterologous prime-boost regimens in mice and non-human primates. We find S is highly immunogenic in mice, while the comparatively poor immunogenicity of RBD was associated with limiting germinal centre and T follicular helper cell activity. Boosting S-primed mice with either S or RBD significantly augmented neutralising titres, with RBD-focussing driving moderate improvement in serum neutralisation. In contrast, both S and RBD vaccines were comparably immunogenic in macaques, eliciting serological neutralising activity that generally exceed levels in convalescent humans. These studies confirm recombinant S proteins as promising vaccine candidates and highlight multiple pathways to achieving potent serological neutralisation.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.09.01.278630: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board StatementIACUC: Ethics Statement: Animal studies and related experimental procedures were approved by the University of Melbourne Animal Ethics Committee (#1714193, #1914874).
    IRB: Human clinical study protocols were approved by the University of Melbourne Human Research Ethics Committee (#2056689), and all associated procedures were carried out in accordance with approved guidelines.
    Consent: All participants provided written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variableEight male macaques (Macaca nemestrina) (6-15 years old) were vaccinated with 100μg of SARS-CoV-2 spike or RBD immunogens formulated with 200μg of Monophosphoryl Lipid A (MPLA) liposomes (Polymun) (Baldrick et al., 2002) intramuscularly in the right quadriceps.
    Cell Line Authenticationnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    Isolated cells were stained with Aqua viability dye (Thermofisher) and Fc-blocked with a CD16/32 antibody (93; Biolegend).
    CD16/32
    suggested: None
    Cells were then surface stained with S/RBD probes and the following antibodies: B220 BUV737 (RA3-6B2), IgD BUV395 (11-26c.2a), CD45 Cy7APC (30-F11), SA BV786 (BD)
    CD45
    suggested: (BD Biosciences Cat# 564225, RRID:AB_2716861)
    Cells were then surface stained with S/RBD probes and the following antibodies: IgD AF488 (polyclonal; Southern Biotech), IgM BUV395 (G20-127), IgG BV786 (G18-145) (BD), CD14 BV510 (M5E2), CD3 BV510 (OKT3), CD8a BV510 (RPA-T8), CD16 BV510 (3G8), CD10 BV510 (HI10a)
    CD10
    suggested: (BioLegend Cat# 312220, RRID:AB_2563835)
    For intracellular transcription factor staining, cells were first stained with Aqua viability dye (Life Technologies), followed by S/RBD probes and surface antibodies: IgD AF488 (polyclonal; Southern Biotech), IgG BV786 (G18-145) (BD), CD14 BV510 (M5E2), CD3 BV510 (OKT3), CD8a BV510 (RPA-T8), CD16 BV510 (3G8), CD10 BV510 (HI10a)
    CD14
    suggested: (BioLegend Cat# 348805, RRID:AB_2889063)
    CD3
    suggested: None
    OKT3
    suggested: (BD Biosciences Cat# 566779, RRID:AB_2869862)
    CD8a
    suggested: (Meridian Life Science Cat# MAL10-078, RRID:AB_1070001)
    CD16
    suggested: None
    Flow cytometric detection of ex vivo and antigen-specific TFH: For ex vivo TFH quantification from mice, freshly isolated LN single cell suspensions were stained with the following antibodies: Live/dead Red (Life Technologies), CD3 BV510 (145-2C11; Biolegend), PD-1 BV786 (29F.1A12; Biolegend), CXCR5 BV421 (L138D7; Biolegend), CD4 BUV737 (RM4-5; BD), B220 BV605 (RA3-6B2; BD), and F4/80 PE-Dazzle 594 (T45-2342; BD).
    antigen-specific TFH
    suggested: None
    PD-1 BV786
    suggested: (BD Biosciences Cat# 563789, RRID:AB_2738425)
    B220
    suggested: (BD Biosciences Cat# 563708, RRID:AB_2738383)
    Non-human primate LN suspensions and PBMC were stained with the same protocol, using the following antibodies: Live/dead Aqua (Life Technologies), CD3 Alexa700 (SP34-2; BD), PD-1 BV421 (EH12.2H7; Biolegend), CXCR5 PE (MU5UBEE; ThermoFisher), CD4 BV605 (L200; BD), CD20 BV510 (2H7; BD), CD8 BV650 (RPA-T8; Biolegend), CD95 BUV737 (DX2; BD), ICOS PerCP-Cy5.5 (C398.4A; Biolegend)
    CXCR5
    suggested: (BD Biosciences Cat# 563105, RRID:AB_2738008)
    CD8
    suggested: (Leinco Technologies Cat# C666, RRID:AB_2829809)
    CD95
    suggested: (BD Biosciences Cat# 564710, RRID:AB_2738907)
    NHP cells were stained with the following antibodies: CD3 Alexa700 (SP34-2; BD), PD-1 BV421 (EH12.2H7; Biolegend), CXCR5 PE (MU5UBEE; ThermoFisher), CD4 BV605 (L200; BD), CD20 BV510 (2H7; BD), CD8 BV650 (RPA-T8; Biolegend), CD95 BUV737 (DX2; BD), CCR6 BV785 (G034E3; Biolegend), CXCR3 Pe-Dazzle594 (G02H57; Biolegend)
    CD4
    suggested: None
    CD20
    suggested: (BioLegend Cat# 302356, RRID:AB_2566316)
    CCR6
    suggested: (BioLegend Cat# 353422, RRID:AB_2563660)
    CXCR3
    suggested: None
    Plates were washed prior to incubation with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies for mouse (1:10000; anti-mouse IgG; KPL), macaque (1:10000; anti-macaque IgG; Rockland) or human (1:20000; anti-human IgG; Sigma) for 1 hour at room temperature.
    anti-mouse IgG; KPL
    suggested: (SeraCare KPL Cat# 5450-0011, RRID:AB_2687537)
    anti-macaque IgG
    suggested: None
    anti-human IgG
    suggested: None
    ACE2-RBD inhibition ELISA: An ELISA to measure the ability of plasma antibodies to block interaction between recombinant human ACE2 (kindly provided by Merlin Thomas) and SARS-CoV-2 RBD was performed as previously described (Juno et al., 2020).
    ACE2
    suggested: (Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# PA5-75453, RRID:AB_2719181)
    Experimental Models: Cell Lines
    SentencesResources
    Briefly, the ectodomain of SARS-CoV-2 (isolate WHU1; residues 1 – 1208) with furin cleavage site removed and P986/987 stabilisation mutations36, a C-terminal T4 trimerisation domain, Avitag and His-tag, was expressed in Expi293 cells and purified by Ni-NTA size-exclusion chromatography.
    Expi293
    suggested: RRID:CVCL_D615)
    %Inhibition was plotted against plasma dilutions and the area under curve (AUC) was calculated using Graphpad Prism. Microneutralisation Assay: SARS-CoV-2 isolate CoV/Australia/VIC01/2020 (Caly et al., 2020) was passaged in Vero cells and stored at −80 °C.
    Vero
    suggested: CLS Cat# 605372/p622_VERO, RRID:CVCL_0059)
    Experimental Models: Organisms/Strains
    SentencesResources
    C57BL/6 or BALB/c mice were anesthetised by isoflurane inhalation prior to intramuscular injection of 50 μL vaccine in each hind quadriceps.
    BALB/c
    suggested: None
    B cell receptor sequencing and analysis: B cell receptor sequences were recovered from GC B cells (B220+IgD-GL7+) in the draining iliac lymph node of C57BL/6 mice (n=3) 14 days after a single immunisation with S.
    C57BL/6
    suggested: None
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    %Inhibition was plotted against plasma dilutions and the area under curve (AUC) was calculated using Graphpad Prism. Microneutralisation Assay: SARS-CoV-2 isolate CoV/Australia/VIC01/2020 (Caly et al., 2020) was passaged in Vero cells and stored at −80 °C.
    Graphpad Prism
    suggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)
    All statistical analyses were performed using Prism (GraphPad).
    Prism
    suggested: (PRISM, RRID:SCR_005375)
    GraphPad
    suggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)
    Flow cytometry data was analysed in FlowJo v9 or v10.
    FlowJo
    suggested: (FlowJo, RRID:SCR_008520)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.