Study of Coronavirus Impact on Parisian Population from April to June using Twitter and Text Mining Approach
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
The fast spreading of coronavirus name covid19, generated the actual pandemic forcing to change daily activities. Health Councils of each country promote health policies, close borders and start a partial or total lockdown. One of the first countries in Europe with high impact was Italy. Besides at the end of April, one country with a shared border was on the top of 10 countries with more total cases, then France started with its own battle to beat coronavirus. This paper studies the impact of coronavirus in the poopulation of Paris, France from April 23 to June 18, using Text Mining approach, processing data collected from Social Network and using trends related of searching. First finding is a decreasing pattern of publications/interest, and second is related to health crisis and economical impact generated by coronavirus.
Article activity feed
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2020.08.15.20175810: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar …
SciScore for 10.1101/2020.08.15.20175810: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
-