ACE2 expression in adipose tissue is associated with cardio-metabolic risk factors and cell type composition—implications for COVID-19

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

Background

COVID-19 severity varies widely. Although some demographic and cardio-metabolic factors, including age and obesity, are associated with increasing risk of severe illness, the underlying mechanism(s) are uncertain.

Subjects/methods

In a meta-analysis of three independent studies of 1471 participants in total, we investigated phenotypic and genetic factors associated with subcutaneous adipose tissue expression of Angiotensin I Converting Enzyme 2 ( ACE2 ), measured by RNA-Seq, which acts as a receptor for SARS-CoV-2 cellular entry.

Results

Lower adipose tissue ACE2 expression was associated with multiple adverse cardio-metabolic health indices, including type 2 diabetes (T2D) ( P  = 9.14 × 10 −6 ), obesity status ( P  = 4.81 × 10 −5 ), higher serum fasting insulin ( P  = 5.32 × 10 −4 ), BMI ( P  = 3.94 × 10 −4 ), and lower serum HDL levels ( P  = 1.92 × 10 −7 ). ACE2 expression was also associated with estimated proportions of cell types in adipose tissue: lower expression was associated with a lower proportion of microvascular endothelial cells ( P  = 4.25 × 10 −4 ) and higher proportion of macrophages ( P  = 2.74 × 10 −5 ). Despite an estimated heritability of 32%, we did not identify any proximal or distal expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) associated with adipose tissue ACE2 expression.

Conclusions

Our results demonstrate that individuals with cardio-metabolic features known to increase risk of severe COVID-19 have lower background ACE2 levels in this highly relevant tissue. Reduced adipose tissue ACE2 expression may contribute to the pathophysiology of cardio-metabolic diseases, as well as the associated increased risk of severe COVID-19.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.08.11.20171108: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board Statementnot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variableIn the FUSION study, which included both males and females, analyses were also performed in males and females separately, excluding the sex covariate in the models.

    Table 2: Resources

    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Blood/cell-type proportions for each FUSION adipose sample were estimated using the unmix function from DESeq2 v1.18.155.
    DESeq2
    suggested: (DESeq, RRID:SCR_000154)
    METSIM RNASeq data have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under accession GSE135134.
    Gene Expression Omnibus
    suggested: (Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO, RRID:SCR_005012)

    Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your data.


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.