An Exploration of Impact of COVID 19 on mental health -Analysis of tweets using Natural Language Processing techniques

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

Twitter is one of the world’s biggest social media platforms for hosting abundant number of user-generated posts. It is considered as a gold mine of data. Majority of the tweets are public and thereby pullable unlike other social media platforms. In this paper we are analyzing the topics related to mental health that are recently (June, 2020) been discussed on Twitter. Also amidst the on-going pandemic, we are going to find out if covid-19 emerges as one of the factors impacting mental health. Further we are going to do an overall sentiment analysis to better understand the emotions of users.

Executive Summery

Novel Corona virus’s spread and its impact on various aspects of national and individual’s well-being has been at the center of lot of discussions across micro-blogging sites and various social media platforms ever since it commenced in December 2019. Users are voicing their opinions on several topics related to covid-19. Social distancing as prescribed by Government and Local Administration We all are aware that the Novel Corona virus has significantly affected our physical health; however the current social distancing norms are taking a toll on the psychological well-being of individuals. The research paper presents a two-phased analysis of most recent 2000 tweets related to mental health pulled out twice over a span of one month on 28 June 2020 and 28 July2020 respectively, thereby analyzing 4000 tweets in total. The second phase analysis was conducted exactly after a gap of one month to validate the results generated by the first analysis. The intention is to analyze to what extent people have discussed about mental health in the past few months based on the information disseminated on Twitter. Data was extracted using Twitter’s search application programming interface (API) and Python’s tweepy library. A predefined keyword like ‘mental health’ was given to find out if Covid-19 emerges as a reason for the same. Several natural language processing (NLP) techniques like tokenization, removing URL and stop words, stemming and lemmatization were used to pre-process the text data and make it ready for analysis. These collected tweets were analyzed using word frequencies of single and double words (unigram, bigram). A very unique feature of this analysis includes a network diagram that shows interconnections between the set of most common words used in to its and the connections (if any) are represented through links. Topic modeling technique in NLP visualizes the top concerns of tweeters through a word cloud. At present we have many methods to do topic modeling. In this paper we are using the Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) method which is a probabilistic approach of modeling given by Prof David H.B in 2003. This model deals with distribution of topics to tweets and allocation of those topics to documents and words to topics. Finally a sentiment analysis is done using text mining techniques to analyze the sentiment of the tweets in the form of positive, negative and neutral.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.07.30.20165571: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board Statementnot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.


    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.