Training and reployment of non-specialists is an effective solution for the shortage of health care workers in the COVID-19 pandemic
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
Importance
In the COVID-19 pandemic many countries encounter problems arising from shortage of specialists. Short intensive training and reployment of non-specialists is an option but the effectiveness is unknown.
Objective
To investigate whether there was difference in in-hospital mortality rates between COVID-19 patients managed by a mixed team (including non-specialists who had short intensive training and operated to a strict protocol) and those managed by a specialist team of health care workers.
Design
Cohort study, from January 26, 2020 to April 7, 2020, follow up to April 7, 2020.
Setting
Multicenter - Wuhan Hankou Hospital and Wuhan Xiehe Hospital, Wuhan, China.
Participants
261 HCWs deployed to Wuhan from Guangdong emergency rescue team and the 269 COVID-19 patients they treated.
Exposure
Among 261 health care workers, 130 were in the specialist team and included 33 physicians, 32 of whom (97.0%) of whom were from relevant specialties. Each physician was in charge of 25-27 beds, with a 6-hour shift time. The mixed team included 131 health care workers, with 7 of the 28 physicians (25.0%) from relevant specialties. Each physician managed 12-13 beds, with a 4-hour shift time.
Non-specialists received short-term intensive training and then followed strict management protocols. Specialists practiced as normal.
Main Outcomes and Measures
Main outcome was in-hospital mortality of COVID-19 patients. Another outcome was rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection in health care workers.
Results
A total of 269 patients were included (144 male). In-hospital mortality rate of patients treated by the specialist teams and the mixed teams was 12.6% (20/159) and 12.7% (14/110) respectively (Difference = −0.1%, 95% CI −8.2% to 7.9%, p=.97). None of the health care workers were infected.
Conclusions and Relevance
Training and reployment of non-specialists is an effective solution for the shortage of health care workers in the COVID-19 pandemic.
Key Points
Question
Was there difference in mortality rates between COVID-19 patients managed by a mixed team (including non-specialists who had short intensive training and operated to a strict protocol) and those managed by a specialist team of health care workers (HCWs)?
Findings
In-hospital mortality rate among patients managed by specialist team (130 HCWs, 159 patients) and mixed team (131 HCWs, 110 patients) was 12.6% (20/159) and 12.7% (14/110) respectively (Difference = −0.1%, 95% CI −8.2% to 7.9%, p=.97).
Meaning
With shortage of specialist HCWs, training and reployment of non-specialists is an effective option in the management of COVID-19 patients.
Article activity feed
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2020.07.17.20156117: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement IRB: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Wuhan Xiehe Hospital and Wuhan Hankou Hospital.
Consent: The informed consent was waived.Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage …SciScore for 10.1101/2020.07.17.20156117: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement IRB: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Wuhan Xiehe Hospital and Wuhan Hankou Hospital.
Consent: The informed consent was waived.Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
-
