Temporary Immunity and Multiple Waves of COVID-19

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

In this work we use mathematical modeling to describe the potential phenomena which may occur if immunity to COVID-19 lasts for a finite time instead of being permanent, i.e. if a recovered COVID-19 patient may again become susceptible to the virus after a given time interval following his/her recovery. Whether this really happens or not is unknown at the current time. If it does happen, then we find that for certain combinations of parameter values (social mobility, contact tracing, immunity threshold duration etc), the disease can keep recurring in wave after wave of outbreaks, with a periodicity approximately equal to twice the immunity threshold. Such cyclical attacks can be prevented trivially if public health interventions are strong enough to contain the disease outright. Of greater interest is the finding that should such effective interventions not prove possible, then also the second and subsequent waves can be forestalled by a consciously relaxed intervention level which finishes off the first wave before the immunity threshold is breached. Such an approach leads to higher case counts in the immediate term but significantly lower counts in the long term as well as a drastically shortened overall course of the epidemic.

As we write this, there are more than 1,00,00,000 cases (at least, detected cases) and more than 5,00,000 deaths due to COVID-19 all over the globe. The unknowns surrounding this disease outnumber the knowns by orders of magnitude. One of these unknowns is how long does immunity last i.e., once a person recovers from COVID-19 infection, how long does s/he remain insusceptible to a fresh infection. Most modeling studies assume lifetime immunity, or at least sufficiently prolonged immunity as to last until the outbreak is completely over. Among the exceptions are Giordano et. al. [1] and Bjornstad et. al. [2] who account for the possibility of re-infection – while the former find no special behaviour on account of this, the latter find an oscillatory approach towards the eventual equilibrium. In an article which appeared today, Kosinski [3] has found multiple waves of COVID-19 if the immunity threshold is finite. The question of whether COVID-19 re-infection can occur is completely open as of now. A study [4] has found that for benign coronaviruses (NOT the COVID-19 pathogen!), antibodies become significantly weaker six months after the original infection, and re-infection is common from one year onwards. Although it is currently unknown whether COVID-19 re-infections can occur, the mere possibility is sufficiently frightening as to warrant a discussion of what might happen if it is true. In this Article, we use mathematical modeling to present such a discussion. Before starting off, let us declare in the clearest possible terms that this entire Article is a what-if analysis, predicated on an assumption whose veracity is not known at the current time . The contents of this Article are therefore hypothetical – as of now they are neither factual nor counter-factual.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.07.01.20144394: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board Statementnot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.


    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.