Orthogonal Functions for Evaluating Social Distancing Impact on CoVID-19 Spread

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

Early CoVID-19 growth often obeys: , with K o = [(ln 2)/( t dbl )], where t dbl is the pandemic doubling time , prior to society-wide Social Distancing . Previously, we modeled Social Distancing with t dbl as a linear function of time, where N [ t ] 1 ≈ exp[+ K A t / (1+, γ o t )] is used here. Additional parameters besides { K o , γ o } are needed to better model different ρ [ t ] = dN [ t ]/ dt shapes. Thus, a new Orthogonal Function Model [ OFM ] is developed here using these orthogonal function series: where N ( Z ) and Z [ t ] form an implicit N [ t ] N ( Z [ t ]) function, giving: with L m ( Z ) being the Laguerre Polynomials . At large M F values, nearly arbitrary functions for N [ t ] and ρ [ t ] = dN [ t ]/ dt can be accommodated. How to determine { K A , γ o } and the { g m ; m = (0, + M F )} constants from any given N ( Z ) dataset is derived, with ρ [ t ] set by:

The bing com USA CoVID-19 data was analyzed using M F = (0, 1, 2) in the OFM . All results agreed to within about 10 percent, showing model robustness. Averaging over all these predictions gives the following overall estimates for the number of USA CoVID-19 cases at the pandemic end: which compares the pre- and post-early May bing com revisions. The CoVID-19 pandemic in Italy was examined next. The M F = 2 limit was inadequate to model the Italy ρ [ t ] pandemic tail. Thus, regions with a quick CoVID-19 pandemic shutoff may have additional Social Distancing factors operating, beyond what can be easily modeled by just progressively lengthening pandemic doubling times (with 13 Figures ).

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.06.30.20143149: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board Statementnot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.


    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.