EVALUATION OF THE ABBOTT SARS-COV-2 IG-G ASSAY

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

Introduction

Antibodies to the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can increase as soon as 10-13 days after infection. We describe our evaluation of the Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay on the Architect immunoassay analyser.

Methods

We assessed the precision, sensitivity, and specificity of the Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay in samples from polymerase chain reaction (PCR) positive patients and healthy healthcare workers. The manufacturer cut-off index (COI) of 1.4 was adopted to identify positive results. We examined the assay cross-reactivity with other viral antibodies (influenza/dengue/hepatitis C/hepatitis B) and rheumatoid factor (RF). The sample throughput of the Abbott assay was also assessed.

Results

The Abbott assay showed excellent precision, with a CV of 3.4% for the negative control (COI = 0.06) and 1.6% for a high positive serum sample (COI = 8.6). Residual serum was available from 57 inpatients not initially suspected of having COVID-19, 29 of whom tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 IgG. The Abbott assay has a sensitivity of 90.9-100% when tested in 54 subjects ≥14 days post PCR positive, and a specificity of 100% (N = 358). There was no cross-reactivity with other viral antibodies (influenza/dengue/hepatitis C/hepatitis B) and RF. The Architect Abbott assay has a throughput of 100 samples in 70 minutes.

Conclusion

The Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay shows excellent performance that is well within FDA and CDC guidelines when testing patients ≥14 days POS with little cross-reactivity from other viral antibodies. There is some evidence that SARS-CoV-2 IgG develops early in the disease process.

IMPACT STATEMENT

With the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic still ongoing, laboratories are hard pressed to introduce SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing to help as an indirect marker for infection to identify patients with prior infection/exposure. The Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay has excellent performance with good precision, specificity, and sensitivity ≥14 days after a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test, with a competitive throughput of 100 samples in 70 minutes. It shows no cross-reactivity with other viral antibodies (influenza/dengue/hepatitis B/hepatitis C) and rheumatoid factor. We have also found evidence of early antibody development in some patients before they tested positive on the SARS-CoV-2 PCR test.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.06.28.20132498: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board StatementIRB: As this work was part of routine evaluation of new diagnostic assays, it was deemed exempt by our institutional review board.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    The Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay is a qualitative chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay used for the detection of IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 (undisclosed epitope on the viral nucleocapsid) in human serum/plasma on the ARCHITECT i2000 System.
    SARS-CoV-2
    suggested: None
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Statistical analyses were performed using MedCalc software v19.3.1 (MedCalc, Ostend, Belgium).
    MedCalc
    suggested: (MedCalc, RRID:SCR_015044)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    A limitation of our study is that it is a single centre study, and we do not have the sero-prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in our community population. In addition, we only had few samples for cases before and after 0-<7 days POS. Further studies on larger populations would be desirable.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.