Engineered human mesenchymal stem cells as new vaccine platform for COVID-19

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article

Abstract

Recently, there are several routes for COVID-19 vaccine research, yet their weaknesses lie in low efficiency, tolerability, immune adaptability and safety. We describe a new approach to COVID-19 based on engineered human mesenchymal stem cells(hu-MSC), which is like a small protein antigen response device, but will be gradually cleared and degraded by body’s immune system among recognization process. The antibody response results show that this is effective and fast. Furthermore, after several antibody response tests, we obtained an injection of a set of cocktail-like modified human mesenchymal stem cell line. This strategy opened a new avenue for vaccine design against COVID-19.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.06.20.163030: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board StatementIACUC: Animal works were approved by ethical committee of Shenyang University of Chemical Technology.
    RandomizationThen, the mice were randomly divided into two groups, according to the two injection ways (intravenous and subculaneous).
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variableAnimal: All mice in our experiment were provided by Changsheng Animal Research Institute in Liaoning Province, and Male and female C57BL/6 mice (4-8 weeks old) were used for immune injection.
    Cell Line Authenticationnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    We assessed the ability of mice to produce antibodies against nucleocapsid protein by ELISA analysis.
    antibodies against nucleocapsid protein by ELISA analysis.
    suggested: None
    Experimental Models: Cell Lines
    SentencesResources
    Hu-MSC cell isolation: The fresh umbilical cord tissue was cut into some pieces and isolated enzymatically in an incubation solution of 10mL Trypsin-EDTA (Cat:
    Hu-MSC
    suggested: None
    Experimental Models: Organisms/Strains
    SentencesResources
    Generation of vectored antigen protein by eukaryotic expressing system: Refferring to the SARS-COV-2 virus genome sequence from Wuhan-Hu-1 annotated in Genebank (locus:NC_045512.2 or MN908947)[23], we synthesized the spike gene, membrane gene and nucleocapsid gene in gene synthesis company (GENEWIZ, china).
    MN908947
    suggested: None
    Engineered hu-MSC injection and in vivo immunization: An equal amount of male and female C57BL/6 mice, aged from six to eight weeks, were taken.
    C57BL/6
    suggested: None

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We found bar graphs of continuous data. We recommend replacing bar graphs with more informative graphics, as many different datasets can lead to the same bar graph. The actual data may suggest different conclusions from the summary statistics. For more information, please see Weissgerber et al (2015).


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No funding statement was detected.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.