The prognostic value of comorbidity for the severity of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis study
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
With the increase in the number of COVID-19 infections, the global health apparatus is facing insufficient resources. The main objective of the current study is to provide additional data regarding the clinical characteristics of the patients diagnosed with COVID-19, and in particular to analyze the factors associated with disease severity, lack of improvement, and mortality.
Methods
102 studies were included in the present meta-analysis, all of which were published before September 24, 2020. The studies were found by searching a number of databases, including Scopus, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Embase. We performed a thorough search from early February until September 24. The selected papers were evaluated and analyzed using Stata software application version 14.
Results
Ultimately, 102 papers were selected for this meta- analysis, covering 121,437 infected patients. The mean age of the patients was 58.42 years. The results indicate a prevalence of 79.26% for fever (95% CI: 74.98–83.26; I 2 = 97.35%), 60.70% for cough (95% CI: 56.91–64.43; I 2 = 94.98%), 33.21% for fatigue or myalgia (95% CI: 28.86–37.70; I 2 = 96.12%), 31.30% for dyspnea (95% CI: 26.14–36.69; I 2 = 97.67%), and 10.65% for diarrhea (95% CI: 8.26–13.27; I 2 = 94.20%). The prevalence for the most common comorbidities was 28.30% for hypertension (95% CI: 23.66–33.18; I 2 = 99.58%), 14.29% for diabetes (95% CI: 11.88–16.87; I 2 = 99.10%), 12.30% for cardiovascular diseases (95% CI: 9.59–15.27; I 2 = 99.33%), and 5.19% for chronic kidney disease (95% CI: 3.95–6.58; I 2 = 96.42%).
Conclusions
We evaluated the prevalence of some of the most important comorbidities in COVID-19 patients, indicating that some underlying disorders, including hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and chronic kidney disease, can be considered as risk factors for patients with COVID-19 infection. Furthermore, the results show that an elderly male with underlying diseases is more likely to have severe COVID-19.
Article activity feed
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2020.06.11.20128835: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement IRB: This paper was performed under the approval of ethics committee of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (IR.SBMU.RETECH.REC.1399.084). Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources We searched PubMed and Scopus databases to obtain qualified studies that were published on COVID-19 until May 1, 2020. PubMedsuggested: (PubMed, RRID:SCR_004846)The Metaprop (meta-analysis for proportion) was used in STATA and when p was near to 0 or 1. STATAsuggested: (Stata, RRID:SCR_012763)Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We …
SciScore for 10.1101/2020.06.11.20128835: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement IRB: This paper was performed under the approval of ethics committee of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (IR.SBMU.RETECH.REC.1399.084). Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources We searched PubMed and Scopus databases to obtain qualified studies that were published on COVID-19 until May 1, 2020. PubMedsuggested: (PubMed, RRID:SCR_004846)The Metaprop (meta-analysis for proportion) was used in STATA and when p was near to 0 or 1. STATAsuggested: (Stata, RRID:SCR_012763)Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
-