The origin and early spread of SARS-CoV-2 in Europe

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Abstract

We estimate the origin and spread of SARS-CoV-2 in Europe prior to spring 2020 border closures based on viral genome sequences using a phylodynamic model with geographic structure. We confirm that the predominant European outbreak most likely started in Italy and spread from there. This outbreak was probably seeded by a transmission event in either Hubei, China or Germany. In particular, we find that before the first border closures in Europe, the rate of new cases occurring from within-country transmission was within or exceeded the estimated bounds on the rate of new migration cases.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.06.10.20127738: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    NIH rigor criteria are not applicable to paper type.

    Table 2: Resources

    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Parameter inference: For inferences, we used the implementation of the multi-type birth-death model in the bdmm package (19, 20) in the BEAST2 software (21).
    BEAST2
    suggested: (BEAST2, RRID:SCR_017307)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    Estimates for the reproductive number fall roughly within the range of previous estimates (29), though we mention a particular caveat with respect to the reproductive number in Hubei below. Unsurprisingly, prevalence estimates in early March generally exceed confirmed case counts by a factor of 1-3 (Figure S4). Our inferences of epidemiological parameters do not challenge the idea that the early reproductive number in different outbreaks is difficult to estimate precisely, but not hugely variable, and that there is substantial under-reporting in line-list data (30). Finally, we estimated the rate of new cases arising from migration compared with the rate of new cases arising from within-region transmission in the regions analyzed. The magnitudes of these rates are quite uncertain due to uncertainty in the inferred migration and transmission rates (Figure S11) and under-reporting in case counts, which we implicitly assume to be constant in time and between demes. However, the temporal trends suggested by these data are still compelling and robust towards different prior assumptions. We see that under sustained risk of case migration from Hubei, isolated cases were confirmed throughout Europe beginning in late January 2020 but did not immediately cause large outbreaks. Shortly after the first evidence of sustained within-region transmission in Italy, outbreaks in the rest of Europe also took hold (Figure 2). Our results based on the multi-type birth-death model take into accoun...

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.