A TRANSPARENT, OPEN-SOURCE SIRD MODEL FOR COVID19 DEATH PROJECTIONS IN INDIA
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
As India emerges from the lockdown with ever higher COVID19 case counts and a mounting death toll, reliable projections of case numbers and deaths counts are critical in informing policy decisions. We examine various existing models and their shortcomings. Given the amount of uncertainty surrounding the disease we choose a simple SIRD model with minimal assumptions enabling us to make robust predictions. We employ publicly available mobility data from Google to estimate social distancing covariates which influence how fast the disease spreads. We further present a novel method for estimating the uncertainty in our predictions based on first principles. To demonstrate, we fit our model to three regions (Spain, Italy, NYC) where the peak has passed and obtain predictions for the Indian states of Delhi and Maharashtra where the peak is desperately awaited.
Article activity feed
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2020.06.02.20119917: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar …
SciScore for 10.1101/2020.06.02.20119917: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
-
-