COVID-19 containment in the Caribbean: The experience of small island developing states

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.05.27.20114538: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    NIH rigor criteria are not applicable to paper type.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.


    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    National evidence-based risk assessments, drawing on country-level goals and limitations must now be a priority. Continued outbreak surveillance remains a critical tool to enable swift action following accelerated transmission. As always, it could be sensible to learn from successful models implemented elsewhere. This descriptive study has limitations. We focus only on NPIs related to movement and we recognize that other NPIs such as contact tracing, and isolation and quarantine protocols will have also helped to reduce transmission. We have described the type and timing of NPIs implemented and have inferred their impact on COVID-19 transmission. However, we have not attempted to quantify these effects, nor have we accounted for other factors that may impact transmission, such as the effect of climate on virus longevity. (20) The data we use in this article has been drawn from disparate sources, each of which has limitations. The number of cases we report is based on the number of tests performed, and as population-level testing remains economically impractical, no country currently knows the extent of their underlying outbreak. The NPI data are drawn partly from informal sources such as media reports with implied quality concerns. To counter this we have made systematic efforts to triangulate our NPI information wherever possible. Although we have used two quantitative categories to describe the implementation of lockdowns, in reality national stay-at-home orders varied mark...

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.