Understanding Spatial Heterogeneity of COVID-19 Pandemic Using Shape Analysis of Growth Rate Curves

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article

Abstract

The growth rates of COVID-19 across different geographical regions (e.g., states in a nation, countries in a continent) follow different shapes and patterns. The overall summaries at coarser spatial scales that are obtained by simply averaging individual curves (across regions) obscure nuanced variability and blurs the spatial heterogeneity at finer spatial scales. We employ statistical methods to analyze shapes of local COVID-19 growth rate curves and statistically group them into distinct clusters, according to their shapes. Using this information, we derive the so-called elastic averages of curves within these clusters, which correspond to the dominant incidence patterns. We apply this methodology to the analysis of the daily incidence trajectory of the COVID-pandemic at two spatial scales: A state-level analysis within the USA and a country-level analysis within Europe during mid-February to mid-May, 2020. Our analyses reveal a few dominant incidence trajectories that characterize transmission dynamics across states in the USA and across countries in Europe. This approach results in broad classifications of spatial areas into different trajectories and adds to the methodological toolkit for guiding public health decision making at different spatial scales.

Highlights

  • Coarsely summarizing epidemic data collected at finer spatial scales can result in a loss of heterogenous spatial patterns that exist at finer scales. For instance, the average curves may give the impression that the epidemic’s trajectory is declining when, in fact, the trajectory of the epidemic is increasing in certain areas.

  • Shape analysis of COVID-19 growth rate curves discovers significant heterogeneity in epidemic spread patterns across spatial areas which can be statistically clustered into distinct groups.

  • At a higher level, clustering spatial patterns into distinct groups helps discern broad trends, such as rapid growth, leveling off, and slow decline in epidemic growth curves resulting from local transmission dynamics. At a finer level, it helps identify temporal patterns of multiple waves that characterize rate curves for different clusters.

  • Quantitative methods for characterizing the spatial-temporal dynamics of evolving epidemic emergencies provide an objective framework to understand transmission dynamics for public health decision making.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.05.25.20112433: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    NIH rigor criteria are not applicable to paper type.

    Table 2: Resources

    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    To perform clustering of 51 curves into smaller groups, we apply the dendrogram function in Matlab using the “ward” linkage.
    Matlab
    suggested: (MATLAB, RRID:SCR_001622)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    Moreover, a limitation of our analysis stems from the fact that testing rates have generally improved across spatial areas during the course of the pandemic, which could have influenced the shapes of the epidemic curves particularly during the early transmission phase. In particular, the process of ramping up testing rates took several weeks in the USA, and accumulating evidence suggests that the epidemic in the USA and Europe likely started much earlier than initially thought.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.