IgA MAb blocks SARS-CoV-2 Spike-ACE2 interaction providing mucosal immunity

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article

Abstract

COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2 has become a global pandemic requiring the development of interventions for the prevention or treatment to curtail mortality and morbidity. No vaccine to boost mucosal immunity or as a therapeutic has yet been developed to SARS-CoV-2. In this study we discover and characterize a cross-reactive human IgA monoclonal antibody, MAb362. MAb362 binds to both SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins and competitively blocks hACE2 receptor binding, by completely overlapping the hACE2 structural binding epitope. Furthermore, MAb362 IgA neutralizes both pseudotyped SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 in human epithelial cells expressing hACE2. SARS-CoV-2 specific IgA antibodies, such as MAb362, may provide effective immunity against SARS-CoV-2 by inducing mucosal immunity within the respiratory system, a potentially critical feature of an effective vaccine.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.05.15.096719: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board Statementnot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Cell Line Authenticationnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    Isotype switching was conducted using primers designed to amplify the variable heavy chain of the IgG antibody.
    IgG
    suggested: None
    IgG and IgA1 antibodies were transfected in Expi293 cells and purified as previously described32.
    IgA1
    suggested: None
    After incubation, the cell pellets were washed and then resuspened in PBS with 2% FBS and incubated with 10 µg/mL of anti-Myc antibody for 1 hour at 4°C.
    anti-Myc
    suggested: None
    Experimental Models: Cell Lines
    SentencesResources
    IgG and IgA1 antibodies were transfected in Expi293 cells and purified as previously described32.
    Expi293
    suggested: RRID:CVCL_D615)
    Flow cytometry-based receptor binding inhibition assay: Vero E6 cells were harvested with PBS containing 5 mM EDTA and aliquoted to 1×106 cells per reaction.
    Vero E6
    suggested: None
    Before mixing with the cells, Myc-tagged SARS-CoV S1-590 or SARS-CoV-2 S1-604 was incubated with the MAb at varying concentrations for 1 hour at room temperature, then the S protein was added to the Vero cells to a final concentration of 10 nM.
    Vero
    suggested: None
    SARS-S and SARS2-S spike protein was provided in trans by co-transfection of 293T cells with pcDNA-G with pNL4-3.
    293T
    suggested: None
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Cells were washed twice then subjected to flow cytometric analysis using a MACSquant Flow Cytometer (Miltenyi Biotec) and analyzed by FlowJo (version 10).
    FlowJo
    suggested: (FlowJo, RRID:SCR_008520)
    The molecular modeling of MAb362 was performed through the program Modeller 9.15 using the basic modeling and forming the initial MAb362:SARS-CoV RBD complex.
    Modeller
    suggested: (MODELLER, RRID:SCR_008395)
    Hydrogen bonds were determined for pairs of eligible donor/acceptor atoms using criteria set by Schrodinger (Schrodinger, LLC, The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.3r1. 2010.).
    PyMOL
    suggested: (PyMOL, RRID:SCR_000305)
    Each assay was performed in triplicate. c Statistical Analysis: Statistical calculations were performed using Prism version 7.03 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA).
    Prism
    suggested: (PRISM, RRID:SCR_005375)
    GraphPad
    suggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: Please consider improving the rainbow (“jet”) colormap(s) used on page 14. At least one figure is not accessible to readers with colorblindness and/or is not true to the data, i.e. not perceptually uniform.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No funding statement was detected.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.