Importance of suppression and mitigation measures in managing COVID-19 outbreaks

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

I employ a simple mathematical model of an epidemic process to evaluate how four basic quantities: the reproduction number (ℛ), the numbers of sensitive (S) and infectious individuals (I), and total community size (N) affect strategies to control COVID-19. Numerical simulations show that strict suppression measures at the beginning of an epidemic can create low infectious numbers, which thereafter can be managed by mitigation measures over longer periods to flatten the epidemic curve. The stronger the suppression measure, the faster it achieves the low numbers of infections that are conducive to subsequent management. Our results on short-term strategies point to a two-step control strategy, following failed mitigation, that begins with suppression of the reproduction number, ℛ C , below 1.0, followed by renewed mitigation measures that manage the epidemic by maintaining the effective reproduction number ℛ C eff ≈ ℛ C S/N at approximately 1.0. The objectives of the full sequence of measures observed in a number of countries, and likely to be seen in the longer term, can be symbolically represented as: ℛ 0 → ℛ C <ℛ 0 →ℛ C <1.0 → ℛ C eff 1.0. We discuss the predictions of this analysis and how it fits into longer-term sequences of measures, including misconceptions about ‘flattening the curve’ and how the herd immunity concept can be used to ‘leverage’ immunity.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.03.31.20048835: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    NIH rigor criteria are not applicable to paper type.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.


    Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your data.


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.