Internet and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from the UK

  1. Climent Quintana-Domeque
  2. Jingya Zeng
  3. Xiaohui Zhang

Reviewed by

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

Log in to save this article

Abstract

With the COVID-19 pandemic, the internet has become a key player in the daily lives of most people. We investigate the relationship between mental health and internet use frequency and purpose, 6 months after the first lockdown in the UK, in September 2020. Using data from the UK Household Longitudinal Study on the 12-item General Health Questionnaire and the internet use module, and controlling for sociodemographic characteristics and personality traits, we find that older individuals (aged 59 years or above) have a lower internet use frequency (twice a day or less). Younger women use the internet for social purposes more than men do, while younger men use the internet for leisure-and-learning purposes more than women and older men do. Interestingly, high internet use is a protective factor for social dysfunction among younger women, but a risk factor for psychological distress among younger men. While leisure-and-learning purpose is a protective factor for social dysfunction among younger women, it is a risk factor for social dysfunction among younger men. Finally, loneliness seems to play a role: higher internet frequency use is a stronger protective factor for social dysfunction among younger women who feel lonelier but a stronger risk factor for mental health among younger men who feel lonelier.

Article activity feed

  1. Version published to 10.1093/ooec/odac007
  2. ScreenIT

    SciScore for 10.1101/2022.04.01.22273299: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Ethicsnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.

    Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your data.

    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.

    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.

    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.

    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.

  3. Version published to 10.1101/2022.04.01.22273299v1 on medRxiv